Cited by 22SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyImmune responses and vaccinations

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 COVID-19 booster vaccinations after two doses of BNT162b2 among healthcare workers in Japan: a prospective observational study

Open access
Naito, Toshio, Tsuchida, Nao, Kusunoki, Susumu, Kaneko, Yoshihiro, Tobita, Morikuni, Hori, Satoshi, Ito, Suminobu·2022·Expert Review of Vaccines

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 booster doses after the primary two-dose BNT162b2 series in Japan and is the first report from Western Pacific region. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthcare workers receiving the two-dose BNT162b2 series and eligible for booster vaccination were enrolled. Self-reported adverse reactions were recorded for 8 days. Antibody titer was measured at baseline and on day 28. RESULTS: A total of 2,931 and 890 subjects received BNT162b2 (homologous) and mRNA-1273 (heterologous) booster vaccinations, respectively. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG titer increased by 50.9- and 64.3-fold in the homologous and heterologous groups, respectively. Immunogenicity was greater with increasing age, regardless of sex. Adverse reactions were mild to moderate and decreased with age. The most common adverse reactions were injection-site pain (92.2%), fatigue (71.8%), headache (58.3%), and fever ≥37.5°C (46.5%). Two cases of non-severe myocarditis occurred in the heterologous group and resolved without clinical sequelae. CONCLUSION: Homologous booster schedules had fewer reported adverse reactions; heterologous boosters elicited greater immunogenicity. Among different age groups, subjects aged 60 or over had the lowest immunogenicity before the booster, and both homologous and heterologous boosters restored vaccine immunogenicity level comparable to those of younger age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14760584.2022.2093722

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naito, T., Tsuchida, N., Kusunoki, S., Kaneko, Y., Tobita, M., Hori, S., & Ito, S.
Affiliations
  • Juntendo University (JP)
  • National Hospital Organization (JP)
  • Japan Community Healthcare Organization (JP)
  • Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety (JP)
Corresponding author
Ito, Suminobu
Venue
Expert Review of Vaccines
Published
2022-07-04
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
1319-1329
ISSN
  • 1476-0584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8395
OpenAlex
W4283694088
Cited by
22
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (20HA2013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
COVID-19 booster vaccination, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine reactogenicity, adverse effects, myocarditis, homologous booster, heterologous booster, healthcare workers, Japan
MeSH terms
COVID-19, BNT162 Vaccine, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Antibodies, Viral, Health Personnel, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Japan, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review