Cited by 1,169SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Protection of BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster against Covid-19 in Israel

Open access
Bar-On, Yinon M., Goldberg, Yair, Mandel, Micha, Bodenheimer, Omri, Freedman, Laurence, Kalkstein, Nir, Mizrahi, Barak, Alroy-Preis, Sharon +3 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On July 30, 2021, the administration of a third (booster) dose of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) was approved in Israel for persons who were 60 years of age or older and who had received a second dose of vaccine at least 5 months earlier. Data are needed regarding the effect of the booster dose on the rate of confirmed coronavirus 2019 disease (Covid-19) and the rate of severe illness. METHODS: We extracted data for the period from July 30 through August 31, 2021, from the Israeli Ministry of Health database regarding 1,137,804 persons who were 60 years of age or older and had been fully vaccinated (i.e., had received two doses of BNT162b2) at least 5 months earlier. In the primary analysis, we compared the rate of confirmed Covid-19 and the rate of severe illness between those who had received a booster injection at least 12 days earlier (booster group) and those who had not received a booster injection (nonbooster group). In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the rate of infection 4 to 6 days after the booster dose as compared with the rate at least 12 days after the booster. In all the analyses, we used Poisson regression after adjusting for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: At least 12 days after the booster dose, the rate of confirmed infection was lower in the booster group than in the nonbooster group by a factor of 11.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4 to 12.3); the rate of severe illness was lower by a factor of 19.5 (95% CI, 12.9 to 29.5). In a secondary analysis, the rate of confirmed infection at least 12 days after vaccination was lower than the rate after 4 to 6 days by a factor of 5.4 (95% CI, 4.8 to 6.1). CONCLUSIONS: In this study involving participants who were 60 years of age or older and had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 5 months earlier, we found that the rates of confirmed Covid-19 and severe illness were substantially lower among those who received a booster (third) dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2114255

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plenty of articles have demonstrated the efficacy of two-dose vaccination and additional boosters in reducing mortality and severe cases.

    “As plenty of articles have demonstrated the efficacy of two-dose vaccination and additional boosters in reducing mortality and severe cases [13,14,35-37]”

    From Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results (Effect of the Booster Dose; page not provided) report substantially fewer severe Covid-19 cases among booster recipients than among participants who had received only two doses. The paper does not report mortality as an outcome, and its comparison does not establish the effect of two doses versus no vaccination. It therefore supports the booster-and-severe-illness part of the cited statement, but not the full claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The third dose of BNT162b2 increases immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2, as reflected by a rapid and broad immune response.

    “Studies have demonstrated that the third dose increases immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 as reflected by a rapid and broad immune response to the third BNT162b2 dose7,11.”

    From Waning effectiveness of the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The passage labeled Abstract > Conclusions (page not provided) reports that initial studies suggested a roughly tenfold increase in antibody neutralization after a BNT162b2 booster. Methods > Study Design (page not provided) says neutralization levels increase after several days. The paper does not establish a broad immune response; its own study measured infection and severe illness, not immunogenicity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Booster vaccines seem promising both in preventing infection and severe progression.

    “Since booster vaccines seem promising both in preventing infection and severe progression [35-37]”
  • The lack of pre-defined PCR testing protocols implemented in the study population presented a challenge and could lead to potential biases relating to healthcare seeking behaviour.

    “The lack of pre-defined PCR testing protocols implemented in the study population also presented a challenge. This limitation has been discussed extensively in previous covid-19 observational studies and could lead to potential biases relating to healthcare seeking behaviour.6 11 38 39”
  • Results from clinical trials with over 5,000 people who had received BioNTech/Pfizer booster injections showed that protection conferred by the vaccine was 95.6%.

    “However, results from clinical trials with over 5,000 people who had received BioNTech/Pfizer booster injections showed that protection conferred by the vaccine was 95.6%.392–394”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [393]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]2. Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, et al. Waning immunity of the BNT162b2 vaccine: a nationwide study from Israel. August 30, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262423v1). preprint. · DOI
  2. [5]5. Wall EC, Wu M, Harvey R, et al. Neutralising antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by BNT162b2 vaccination. Lancet 2021;397:2331-2333.
  3. [6]6. Pfizer quarterly corporate performance — second quarter 2021. Pfizer, July 28, 2021. (https://investors.pfizer.com/events-and-presentations/event-details/2021/Pfizer-Quarterly-Corporate-Performance--Second-Quarter-2021/default.aspx).
  4. [7]7. Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 2021;27:1205-1211.
  5. [8]8. Muhsen K, Na’aminh W, Lapidot Y, et al. A nationwide analysis of population group differences in the COVID-19 epidemic in Israel, February 2020–February 2021. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021;7:100130-100130.
  6. [10]10. Lustig Y, Sapir E, Regev-Yochay G, et al. BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and correlates of humoral immune responses and dynamics: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study in health-care workers. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:999-1009.
  7. [11]11. Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2439-2450.
  8. [12]12. McAloon C, Collins Á, Hunt K, et al. Incubation period of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. BMJ Open 2020;10(8):e039652-e039652.
  9. [13]13. Xin H, Wong JY, Murphy C, et al. The incubation period distribution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2021. June 12 (Epub ahead of print).
  10. [15]15. Kleinman LC, Norton EC. What’s the risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression. Health Serv Res 2009;44:288-302.
  11. [16]16. Puranik A, Lenehan PJ, Silvert E, et al. Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence. August 21, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v3). preprint. · DOI
  12. [17]17. Tang P, Hasan MR, Chemaitelly H, et al. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in Qatar. August 11, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.11.21261885v1). preprint. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bar-On, Y. M., Goldberg, Y., Mandel, M., Bodenheimer, O., Freedman, L., Kalkstein, N., Mizrahi, B., Alroy-Preis, S., Ash, N., Milo, R., & Huppert, A.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot (Y.M.B.-O., R.M.), Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa (Y.G.), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (M.M.) and Israel Ministry of Health (O.B., S.A.-P., N.A.), Jerusalem, the Biostatistical and Biomathematical Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan (L.F., A.H.), KI Research Institute, Kfar Malal (N.K., B.M.), and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv (A.H.) — all in Israel.
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Yair
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-10-07
Volume
385
Issue
15
Pages
1393-1400
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3201177512
Cited by
1,169
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 195 · 2022: 597 · 2021: 233
FWCI
87.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 pandemic, booster vaccination, mRNA vaccines, vaccine efficacy, older adults, confirmed infections, severe illness, Israel, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Poisson Distribution, Databases, Factual, Patient Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review