Cited by 7Mental Health via WritingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structured writing about current stressors: The benefits of developing plans

Lestideau, Olivia T., Lavallee, Loraine F.·2007·Psychology & Health

Abstract

To investigate the health outcomes of structured writing about everyday stressors, 64 undergraduates selected a stressful event with which they were currently dealing, and wrote about it at home on three occasions in 1 week. Two forms of writing were manipulated: expressive writing – exploring one's thoughts and feelings about the stressor; and planful writing – developing plans to deal with the problem. Appraisals of control and efficacy were investigated as mediators. Expressive writing yielded no health benefits and did not affect appraisals, but planful writing did. Whereas non-planners' levels of negative affect (NA) remained stable across writing days, planners initially experienced higher NA, but their NA decreased significantly across writing days. Planful writers, relative to non-planners, felt less control over their emotions and less confidence in resolving their problem, but it was non-planners who experienced an increase in stress-related symptoms following writing. Appraisals did not mediate the physical health outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14768320601176089

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.479 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.1.130 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.149 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.855 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.528 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.174 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.540 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lestideau, O. T., & Lavallee, L. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Northern British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Lavallee, Loraine F.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2007-07-04
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
659-676
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W1967880068
Cited by
7
References
39
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
expressive writing, stressors, stress coping, self-efficacy, negative affect, stress-related symptoms, physical health, mediation, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review