Cited by 50Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchAgricultural and Biological ResearchForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Comparison of different methods for the extraction of cannabinoids from cannabis

Open access
De Vita, Daniela, Madia, Valentina Noemi, Tudino, Valeria, Saccoliti, Francesco, De Leo, Alessandro, Messore, Antonella, Roscilli, Patrizia, Botto, Alfonso +5 more·2020·Natural Product Research

Abstract

Cannabis oils, namely concentrated cannabis extracts, are getting plenty of attention because of their therapeutic potential for treatment of patients with cancer, HIV, multiple sclerosis and several other pathologies. Here we propose the use of ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) as alternative methods to the current protocols followed by pharmacists, the only authorized to manipulate standardized Cannabis. A third method, consisting of the use of Tween 20 as surfactant, was considered. Our best extraction methodology for commercial hemp extraction was applied to medicinal cannabis. Here we report the results obtained for ‘Eletta campana’, ‘Carmagnola selezionata’, Bediol®, FM2® and Bedrocan®.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14786419.2019.1601194

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Vita, D., Madia, V. N., Tudino, V., Saccoliti, F., De Leo, A., Messore, A., Roscilli, P., Botto, A., Pindinello, I., Santilli, G., Scipione, L., Costi, R., & Di Santo, R.
Affiliations
  • Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy;
  • Istituto Pasteur (IT)
  • Exenia group srl Albignasego, Padova, Italy
Corresponding author
Costi, Roberta
Venue
Natural Product Research
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
34
Issue
20
Pages
2952-2958
ISSN
  • 1478-6419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6427
OpenAlex
W2943047807
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Natural Product Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
AbbVie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
cannabinoids, cannabis, medical cannabis, hemp, ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, Tween 20, surfactant-assisted extraction, extraction method comparison
MeSH terms
Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Chemical Fractionation, Microwaves, Plant Extracts, Polysorbates, Surface-Active Agents, Ultrasonics, Molecular Structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review