Cited by 2,169Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNausea and vomiting managementComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Whiting, Penny F., Wolff, Robert F., Deshpande, Sohan, Di Nisio, Marcello, Duffy, Steven, Hernandez, Adrian V., Keurentjes, J. Christiaan, Lang, Shona +5 more·2015·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Cannabis and cannabinoid drugs are widely used to treat disease or alleviate symptoms, but their efficacy for specific indications is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the benefits and adverse events (AEs) of cannabinoids. DATA SOURCES: Twenty-eight databases from inception to April 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of cannabinoids for the following indications: nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, appetite stimulation in HIV/AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity due to multiple sclerosis or paraplegia, depression, anxiety disorder, sleep disorder, psychosis, glaucoma, or Tourette syndrome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Where possible, data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-relevant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impression of change, and AEs. RESULTS: A total of 79 trials (6462 participants) were included; 4 were judged at low risk of bias. Most trials showed improvement in symptoms associated with cannabinoids but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials. Compared with placebo, cannabinoids were associated with a greater average number of patients showing a complete nausea and vomiting response (47% vs 20%; odds ratio [OR], 3.82 [95% CI, 1.55-9.42]; 3 trials), reduction in pain (37% vs 31%; OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.99-2.00]; 8 trials), a greater average reduction in numerical rating scale pain assessment (on a 0-10-point scale; weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.46 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.11]; 6 trials), and average reduction in the Ashworth spasticity scale (WMD, -0.36 [95% CI, -0.69 to -0.05]; 7 trials). There was an increased risk of short-term AEs with cannabinoids, including serious AEs. Common AEs included dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, fatigue, somnolence, euphoria, vomiting, disorientation, drowsiness, confusion, loss of balance, and hallucination. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2015.6358

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mild to moderate central nervous or gastro-intestinal side effects are more common with cannabinoids than with placebo, but severe side effects are rare.

    “Mild to moderate central nervous or gastro-intestinal side effects are more common with cannabinoids than with placebo but severe side effects are rare [13].”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Adverse Events section and Table 3 report higher odds of gastrointestinal and nervous-system adverse events with cannabinoids than with placebo. The paper does not establish that these events were mild to moderate or that severe events were rare; it instead reports increased odds of serious adverse events (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04–1.92). Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medical uses of THC-based cannabinoids are associated with an increased risk of short-term adverse effects, but severe side effects are rare.

    “Medical uses of THC-based cannabinoids are associated with an increased risk of short-term adverse effects, but severe side effects are rare [13].”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion reports an increased risk of short-term adverse events with medical cannabinoids. The Adverse Events section also reports an increased risk of serious adverse events; it does not establish that they are rare. The review covers cannabinoids generally, not only THC-based products. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous systematic reviews have been limited in their coverage of all relevant diseases and primarily ignored that medical cannabinoid products differ in their pharmacology.

    “Previous systematic reviews have been limited in their coverage of all relevant diseases, but most importantly primarily ignored the fact that medical cannabinoid products—a term that encompasses all plant-derived and synthetic derivatives—differ in their pharmacology [1–5].”

    From Medical cannabinoids: a pharmacology-based systematic review and meta-analysis for all relevant medical indications. (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Strengths and Weaknesses section (page unavailable) says almost all previous reviews focused on single indications, supporting the claim that their disease coverage was limited. It says this review stratified analyses by cannabinoid type, but does not say previous reviews primarily ignored pharmacological differences between products. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Data analysis using SMD allowed the inclusion of a large variety of measurements and allowed inclusion of many more RCTs for all relevant medical indications than in a previous extensive meta-analysis.

    “Finally, data analysis using SMD allowed the inclusion of a large variety of measurements in the evaluation of the outcomes and allowed us to include many more RCTs for all relevant medical indications than in a previous extensive meta-analysis [3].”
  • Efforts to self-manage depression with cannabis are increasing despite lack of evidence that cannabinoids are effective for this purpose, and prospectively cannabis worsens the course of depressive disorders.

    “Evidence suggests that efforts to selfmanage depression with cannabis are increasing [71][72][73][74][75] (also Aaron L. Sarvet, MPH, written communication, January 2, 2018) despite lack of evidence that cannabinoids are effective for this purpose 76,77 ; prospectively, cannabis worsens the course of depressive disorders.78”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [8]8. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. CADTH Peer Review Checklist for Search Strategies (Internet). Ottawa, Canada: CADTH; 2013. https://www.cadth.ca/resources/finding-evidence /cadth-peer-review-checklist-search-strategies. Accessed March 17, 2014.
  2. [14]14. Broder LE, Lean NL, Hilsenbeck SG. A randomized blinded clinical trial comparing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and hydroxizine (HZ) as antiemetics (AE) for cancer chemotherapy (CT). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1982;23:514.
  3. [16]16. Hagenbach U, Luz S, Brenneisen R, Mäder M. The treatment of spasticity with D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (D9-THC) in patients with spinal cord injury. Paper presented at: IACM 2nd Conference on Cannabinoids in Medicine; September 12-13, 2003; Cologne, Germany.
  4. [18]18. Denver, CO. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(1):A2720.
  5. [46]46. Ungerleider JT, Andrysiak T, Fairbanks L, Goodnight J, Sarna G, Jamison K. Cannabis and cancer chemotherapy: a comparison of oral delta-9-THC and prochlorperazine. Cancer. 1982;50 (4):636-645.
  6. [48]48. Harden-Harrison MM, Munsell MF, Fisch MJ, et al. Dronabinol for the prevention of nausea from cyclophosphamide and/or adriamycin. Paper presented at: International MASCC/ISOO Symposium: Supportive Care in Cancer; June 28-30, 2012; New York, NY. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:S209-S210.
  7. [50]50. Lane M, Vogel CL, Ferguson J, et al. Dronabinol and prochlorperazine in combination are better than either single agent alone for treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1989;8:326.
  8. [52]52. Chan HS, MacLeod SM, Correia JA. Nabilone vs prochlorperazine for control of cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis in children. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1984;3:108.
  9. [54]54. Frytak S, Moertel CG, Ofallon JR. Comparison of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), prochlorperazine (PCP) and placebo as anti-emetics for cancer-chemotherapy. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1979;20:391.
  10. [56]56. McCabe M, Smith FP, Goldberg D, et al. Comparative trial of oral 9 tetrahydrocannabinol and prochlorperazine for cancer chemotherapy related nausea and vomiting. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res and Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1981;22:416.
  11. [63]63. Ware M, Fitzcharles MA, Joseph L, Shir Y. The effects of nabilone on sleep in fibromyalgia: results of a randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at: Canadian Rheumatology Association Meeting; February 18-21, 2009; Kananaskis, AB: Canada. Abstract 149 J Rheumatol. 2009;36(11):2607.
  12. [80]80. Rog DJ, Nurmikko TJ, Friede T, Young CA. Randomized, controlled trial of cannabis-based medicine in central pain in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005;65(6):812-819.
  13. [90]90. Abrams DI, Jay CA, Vizoso H, et al. Smoked cannabis therapy for HIV-related painful peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Paper presented at: IACM 3rd Conference on Cannabinoids in Medicine; September 9-10, 2005; Leiden, the Netherlands.
  14. [116]116. Cambridge Laboratories Ltd. A randomised, crossover, double blind comparison of the analgesic effect and patient tolerability of nabilone and dihydrocodeine in chronic neuropathic pain. metaRegister of Controlled Trials. http://isrctn.org /ISRCTN15330757. Accessed April 7, 2014.
  15. [136]136. Zajicek J, Reif M, Schnelle M; UK MUSEC Study Investigators. Cannabis extract in the treatment of muscle stiffness and other symptoms in multiple sclerosis -results of the MUSEC study. Paper presented at: IACM 5th Conference on Cannabinoids in Medicine; October 2-3, 2009; Cologne, Germany. 137.
  16. [93]93. Collin C, Ambler Z, Kent R, McCalla R. A randomised controlled study of Sativex® in patients with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. Paper presented at: 22nd Congress of the ECTRIMS; September 27-30, 2006; Madrid, Spain. 138. Robson P, Wade D, Makela P, House H, Bateman C. Cannabis-based medicinal extract (Sativex) produced significant improvements in a subjective measure of spasticity which were maintained on long-term treatment with no evidence of tolerance. Paper presented at: IACM 3rd Conference on Cannabinoids in Medicine; September 9-10, 2005; Leiden, the Netherlands. 139. Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research. Short-term effects of medicinal cannabis therapy on spasticity in multiple sclerosis. ClinicalTrials.gov. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00248378. Accessed April 7, 2014. 140. Institut fur Klinische Forschung Germany;
  17. [155]155. Rohleder C, Pahlisch F, Schaefer C, et al. The endocannabinoid system as a pharmacological target for antipsychotic treatment and more? Paper presented at: 8th International Conference on Early Psychosis: From Neurobiology to Public Policy; October 11-13, 2012; San Francisco, CA. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012;6(suppl 1):7 doi:10.1111/j.1751-7893 .2012.00392.x. · DOI
  18. [164]164. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. MeDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities). http://www .meddra.org/. Accessed September 2, 2014.
  19. [178]178. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Cannabinoids as Co-Analgesics: Review of Clinical Effectiveness. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;2010.
  20. [179]179. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Cannabinoids for the Management of Neuropathic Pain: Review of Clinical Effectiveness. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health);2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whiting, P. F., Wolff, R. F., Deshpande, S., Di Nisio, M., Duffy, S., Hernandez, A. V., Keurentjes, J. C., Lang, S., Misso, K., Ryder, S., Schmidlkofer, S., Westwood, M., & Kleijnen, J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, University “G. D'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy5Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Medical School, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), Lima, Peru7Health Outcomes and Clinical Epidemiology Section, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Institut für Epidemiologie und kongenitale Erkrankungen, Cepicon GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2015-06-23
Volume
313
Issue
24
Pages
2456
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2120227293
Cited by
2,169
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 168 · 2023: 200 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 262 · 2020: 272 · 2019: 230 · 2018: 209 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 131 · 2015: 33
FWCI
22.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
cannabinoids, medical cannabis, nausea and vomiting, chemotherapy-induced nausea, chronic pain, spasticity, multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, psychosis, glaucoma, Tourette syndrome, adverse events, quality of life, activities of daily living, risk of bias, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Anorexia, Mental Disorders, Cannabinoids, Tourette Syndrome, Glaucoma, Humans, Muscle Spasticity, Nausea, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Chronic Pain, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review