The DOI matches its Crossref record.
X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling
Abstract
(1900). X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science: Vol. 50, No. 302, pp. 157-175.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations
Campbell, I. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2832 · Cited by 912
Comparisons of various types of normality tests
Yap, B. W., & Sim, C. H. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.520163 · Cited by 897
Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment
Muchnik, L., Aral, S., & Taylor, S. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240466 · Cited by 892
TSEBRA: transcript selector for BRAKER
Gabriel, L., Hoff, K. J., Brůna, T., Borodovsky, M., & Stanke, M. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04482-0 · Cited by 410
Big Data: Deep Learning for financial sentiment analysis
Sohangir, S., Wang, D., Pomeranets, A., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2018) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-017-0111-6 · Cited by 390
On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance.
Cowles, M., & Davis, C. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.5.553 · Cited by 323
Rafi, Z., & Greenland, S. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01105-9 · Cited by 243
Signaling text-picture relations in multimedia learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis
Richter, J., Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.003 · Cited by 242
Data Lifecycle Challenges in Production Machine Learning: A Survey
Polyzotis, N., Roy, S., Whang, S. E., & Zinkevich, M. (2018) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/3299887.3299891 · Cited by 214
Capuron, L., Ravaud, A., & Dantzer, R. (2001) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200105000-00007 · Cited by 148
Hubbard (2004) · doi:10.1177/0959354304043638 · Cited by 114
How can I choose an explainer?: An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanations
Jesus, S., Belém, C., Balayan, V., Bento, J., Saleiro, P., Bizarro, P., & Gama, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445941 · Cited by 112
Taliaz, D., Spinrad, A., Barzilay, R., Barnett-Itzhaki, Z., Averbuch, D., Teltsh, O., Schurr, R., Darki-Morag, S., & Lerer, B. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01488-3 · Cited by 93
Bartz, J. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10090223 · Cited by 77
Petratou, K., Subkhankulova, T., Lister, J. A., Rocco, A., Schwetlick, H., & Kelsh, R. N. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402 · Cited by 69
Incidence trends and gender differences in malignant mesothelioma in New South Wales, Australia
Hyland, R. A., Ware, S., Johnson, A. R., & Yates, D. H. (2007) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1145 · Cited by 59
Goretzki, B., Wiedemann, C., McCray, B. A., Schäfer, S. L., Jansen, J., Tebbe, F., Mitrovic, S.-A., Nöth, J., Cabezudo, A. C., Donohue, J. K., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39808-4 · Cited by 51
Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests of Myanmar—Analysis Using MODIS Satellite Datasets
Biswas, S., Lasko, K. D., & Vadrevu, K. P. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2015.2423681 · Cited by 41
Tewari, K. S., Java, J. J., Gatcliffe, T. A., Bookman, M. A., & Monk, B. J. (2014) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.013 · Cited by 39
Randomization tests: A new gold standard?
Dugard, P. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.10.001 · Cited by 37
Item Response Theory: A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurement
Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2025) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/23-sts896 · Cited by 30
A multimodal driver monitoring benchmark dataset for driver modeling in assisted driving automation
Dargahi Nobari, K., & Bertram, T. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03137-y · Cited by 29
(2020) · USENIX Security Symposium · Cited by 27
Fernández-Crespo, T., Ordoño, J., Etxeberria, F., Herrasti, L., Armendariz, Á., Vegas, J. I., & Schulting, R. J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43026-9 · Cited by 19
FIDO2 the Rescue? Platform vs. Roaming Authentication on Smartphones
Würsching, L., Putz, F., Haesler, S., & Hollick, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580993 · Cited by 17
Power Comparison of Various Normality Tests
Khan, R. A., & Ahmad, F. (2017) · Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v11i3.1082 · Cited by 16
CheXstray: A Real-Time Multi-Modal Monitoring Workflow for Medical Imaging AI
Merkow, J., Soin, A., Long, J., Cohen, J. P., Saligrama, S., Bridge, C., Yang, X., Kaiser, S., Borg, S., Tarapov, I., et al. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43898-1_32 · Cited by 13
A High-Resolution 15,000Rad Radiation Hybrid Panel for the Domestic Cat
Bach, L. H., Gandolfi, B., Grahn, J. C., Millon, L. V., Kent, M. S., Narfstrom, K., Cole, S. A., Mullikin, J. C., Grahn, R. A., & Lyons, L. A. (2012) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000339416 · Cited by 10
Snus Use in Adolescents: A Threat to Oral Health
Németh, O., Sipos, L., Mátrai, P., Szathmári-Mészáros, N., Iványi, D., Simon, F., Kivovics, M., Pénzes, D., & Mijiritsky, E. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13144235 · Cited by 10
Metacognition of First Year Occupational Therapy Students: A Comparison of Entry-Level Degrees
Dunn, L. S., Lewis-Kipkulei, P., & Bower, R. (2019) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Education · doi:10.26681/jote.2019.030401 · Cited by 7
Lee, W.-C., Lee, J.-S., & Suh, J. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16062816 · Cited by 2
Adjusted NPCR and UACI Reference Values for STL Files under IEEE-754 Validity Constraints
Troev, T., & Stoyanov, B. (2026) · doi:10.20944/preprints202606.1723.v1 · Cited by 1
From Prompts to Contracts: Harness Engineering for Auditable Enterprise LLM Agents
Ahn, J., & Kim, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.08028 · Cited by 1
Auditing a Dutch Public Sector Risk Profiling Algorithm Using an Unsupervised Bias Detection Tool
Holstege, F., Jorgensen, M., Padh, K., Parie, J., Proroković, K., Persson, J., & Snoek, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01713
“Since our bias metric is binary, we use a Pearson χ 2 -test (Pearson, 1900).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, K.
- Venue
- The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1900-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 302
- Pages
- 157-175
- ISSN
- 1941-5982 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-5990
- OpenAlex
- W2031648200
- Cited by
- 4,069
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.