Cited by 912Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations

Campbell, Ian·2007·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Two-by-two tables commonly arise in comparative trials and cross-sectional studies. In medical studies, two-by-two tables may have a small sample size due to the rarity of a condition, or to limited resources. Current recommendations on the appropriate statistical test mostly specify the chi-squared test for tables where the minimum expected number is at least 5 (following Fisher and Cochran), and otherwise the Fisher-Irwin test; but there is disagreement on which versions of the chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests should be used. A further uncertainty is that, according to Cochran, the number 5 was chosen arbitrarily. Computer-intensive techniques were used in this study to compare seven two-sided tests of two-by-two tables in terms of their Type I errors. The tests were K. Pearson's and Yates's chi-squared tests and the 'N-1' chi-squared test (first proposed by E. Pearson), together with four versions of the Fisher-Irwin test (including two mid-P versions). The optimum test policy was found to be analysis by the 'N-1' chi-squared test when the minimum expected number is at least 1, and otherwise, by the Fisher-Irwin test by Irwin's rule (taking the total probability of tables in either tail that are as likely as, or less likely than the one observed). This policy was found to have increased power compared to Cochran's recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.2832

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, I.
Corresponding author
Campbell, Ian
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-21
Volume
26
Issue
19
Pages
3661-3675
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2160927412
Cited by
912
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
small sample testing, chi-square test, type I error, statistical power, Yates' correction, rare events
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, United Kingdom, Chi-Square Distribution, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review