The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context
Abstract
A theory of control in interdependence and power relations is supported by a program of laboratory research. Control needs are basic and predict information-seeking in social relationships. Those without social power typically seek the most diagnostic information, making individuation more likely. Those who do have social power seek less diagnostic information about others and are vulnerable to stereotyping them. Moreover, feelings of control not only reflect individual power positions but also group power positions. Remaining challenges include the impact of outcome expectations on information-seeking and continuing to remedy the power lacuna in social psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language · doi:10.4135/9781446221815.n7 · Cited by 15,148
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.
White, R. W. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040934 · Cited by 5,681
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction.
Berscheid, E., Graziano, W., Monson, T., & Dermer, M. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.34.5.978 · Cited by 404
Cited by
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1 · Cited by 2,298
Toward a second-person neuroscience
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000660 · Cited by 1,510
Making Sense with Institutions: Context, Thought and Action in Karl Weick’s Theory
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606068343 · Cited by 678
Hudson, S., Huang, L., Roth, M. S., & Madden, T. J. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.004 · Cited by 676
Explaining the nature of power: a three-process theory
Turner, J. C. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.244 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E.
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-61
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2035175395
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14792779443000094
- The paper
- Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context. European Review of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
