Cited by 18Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and Assessments

A conceptual synthesis on approximations of practice in mathematics teacher education

Open access
Sapkota, Bima, Max, Brooke·2024·Research in Mathematics Education

Abstract

Approximations of practice are opportunities for preservice teachers (PSTs) to engage in components of teaching. However, how the varying levels of complexity or authenticity of teaching create different learning opportunities for PSTs is underexplored. Forty-one studies related to approximations of mathematics teaching were reviewed to explore how approximations are embedded in PST education, how authenticity represents itself in approximations, and how mathematics teacher educators report approximations facilitating PSTs’ learning. The review identified eight types of approximations used, indicating that PSTs developed aspects of specific practices such as professional noticing, conducting a meaningful mathematics discussion, as well as generic lesson planning and implementation. We propose teacher education programs consider a continuum of authenticity to capture the complexity of approximations of practice as well as the recomposition of decomposed practices. We discuss how varying levels of authenticity in approximations of practice creates different opportunities for PSTs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14794802.2023.2207088

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). Jossey-Bass.
  2. Campbell, M. P., & Elliott, R. (2015). Designing approximations of practice and conceptualising responsive and practice-focused secondary mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 146–164. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085903
  3. 10.12973/eujer.10.3.1541 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sapkota, B., & Max, B.
Affiliations
  • Ball State University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Sapkota, Bima
Venue
Research in Mathematics Education
Published
2023-05-03
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
569-595
ISSN
  • 1479-4802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0178
OpenAlex
W4368368799
Cited by
18
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Research in Mathematics Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
mathematics teacher education, pre-service teachers, authenticity in teaching, professional noticing, lesson planning, lesson implementation, teacher education curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review