Teaching Practice: A Cross-Professional Perspective
Abstract
Background/Context This study investigates how people are prepared for professional practice in the clergy, teaching, and clinical psychology. The work is located within research on professional education, and research on the teaching and learning of practice. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study The purpose of the study is to develop a framework to describe and analyze the teaching of practice in professional education programs, specifically preparation for relational practices. Setting The research took place in eight professional education programs located in seminaries, schools of professional psychology, and universities across the country. Population/Participants/Subjects Our research participants include faculty members, students, and administrators at each of these eight programs. Research Design This research is a comparative case study of professional education across three different professions—the clergy, clinical psychology, and teaching. Our data include qualitative case studies of eight preparation programs: two teacher education programs, three seminaries, and three clinical psychology programs. Data Collection and Analysis For each institution, we conducted site visits that included interviews with administrators, faculty, and staff; observations of multiple classes and field-work; and focus groups with students who were either at the midpoint or at the end of their programs. Conclusions/Recommendations We have identified three key concepts for…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preservice mathematics teachers (PMTs) engage in approximations of practice to rehearse teaching.
“Preservice mathematics teachers (PMTs) engage in approximations of practice (hereafter referred to as “approximations”) to rehearse teaching (Grossman et al., 2009)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Grossman et al., 2009
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733 · see citing works
Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139 · Cited by 2,673 · see citing works
Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview
Barrows, H. S. (1996) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804 · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeichner, K. (2010) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487109347671 · Cited by 2,615 · see citing works
Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654320933544 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Sailer, M., Bauer, E., Hofmann, R., Kiesewetter, J., Glas, J., Gurevych, I., & Fischer, F. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101620 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Challenging approaches: Sharing and responding to weak digital heuristics in class discussions
McGrew, S. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103512 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Two views of culture and their implications for mathematics teaching and learning
Hodge, L. L., & Cobb, P. (2019) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085916641173 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A conceptual synthesis on approximations of practice in mathematics teacher education
Sapkota, B., & Max, B. (2024) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2023.2207088 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Wardrip, P. S., & Herman, P. (2018) · Teacher Development · doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1308428 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Klette, K., Hammerness, K., & Jenset, I. S. (2017) · Acta Didactica Norge · doi:10.5617/adno.4730 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Mikeska, J. N., Francis, D. C., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Park Rogers, M., Shekell, C., Bharaj, P. K., Howell, H., Maltese, A., Thompson, M., & Reich, J. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104858 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Examining Student Thinking Through Teacher Noticing: Commentary
Philipp, R., Fredenberg, M., & Hawthorne, C. (2017) · Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection
Sapkota, B., & Hayes, A. H. (2024) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12644 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Ronfeldt, Matthew
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2055-2100
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2160053845
- Cited by
- 1,508
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 119 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 151.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- teaching practice, professional education, clergy education, clinical psychology training, teacher professional development, relational practice, fieldwork, seminaries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review