Cited by 14Inclusion and Disability in Education and SportRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementDisability Rights and Representation

Using a rapid review process to engage stakeholders, inform policy and set priorities for promoting physical activity and leisure participation for children with disabilities in British Columbia

Mogo, Ebele, Badillo, Icoquih, Majnemer, Annette, Duckworth, Kellie, Kennedy, Sheila, Symington, Vivien, Shikako-Thomas, Keiko·2020·Leisure/Loisir

Abstract

Participation in physical and leisure activity opportunities is critical to the health and wellbeing of children. However, resources and policy interventions that can facilitate participation are usually limited for children with disabilities and their families. Decision-makers can benefit from research evidence to inform the development of programs and policies; however, academic research evidence is scarcely used to support participation for children with disabilities. The integration of stakeholders’ voices with academic research that corroborates their concerns can be a strong strategy to support decision-making that is both relevant to the population and informed by evidence. In this paper, we use a rapid review methodology to support a knowledge translation project around community-based interventions to promote leisure participation for children with disabilities. In line with priorities identified by grassroots organizations, we identified research evidence to support practices regarding: (i) capacity building in adaptive/inclusive recreation, (ii) inclusion and access to community-based leisure programs, and (iii) supportive environments for adaptive and inclusive leisure programs. We synthesized this evidence into briefs targeted for policymakers and community/grassroots organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14927713.2020.1760121

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mogo, E., Badillo, I., Majnemer, A., Duckworth, K., Kennedy, S., Symington, V., & Shikako-Thomas, K.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children (CA)
  • Club Aviva Recreation Ltd, Coquitlam, Canada
  • School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Venue
Leisure/Loisir
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
225-253
ISSN
  • 1492-7713 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2221
OpenAlex
W3035415534
Cited by
14
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leisure/Loisir (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (145104)
  • Employment and Social Development Canada (246516)
  • Operation Enfant Soleil (145104)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
children with disabilities, physical activity, leisure participation, rapid review, knowledge translation, stakeholder engagement, evidence-informed policy, community-based intervention, inclusive recreation, capacity building, supportive environment, grassroots organizations, British Columbia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review