Cited by 29Heavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

Phytoextraction of Pb and Cu Contaminated Soil With Maize and Microencapsulated EDTA

Xie, Zhiyi, Wu, Longhua, Chen, Nengchang, Liu, Chengshuai, Zheng, Yuji, Xu, Shengguang, Li, Fangbai, Xu, Yanling·2012·International Journal of Phytoremediation

Abstract

Chelate-assisted phytoextraction using agricultural crops has been widely investigated as a remediation technique for soils contaminated with low mobility potentially toxic elements. Here, we report the use of a controlled-release microencapsulated EDTA (Cap-EDTA) by emulsion solvent evaporation to phytoremediate soil contaminated with Pb and Cu. Incubation experiments were carried out to assess the effect of Cap- and non-microencapsulated EDTA (Ncap-EDTA) on the mobility of soil metals. Results showed EDTA effectively increased the mobility of Pb and Cu in the soil solution and Cap-EDTA application provided lower and more constant water-soluble concentrations of Pb and Cu in comparison with. Phytotoxicity may be alleviated and plant uptake of Pb and Cu may be increased after the incorporation of Cap-EDTA. In addition phytoextraction efficiencies of maize after Cap- and Ncap-EDTA application were tested in a pot experiment. Maize shoot concentrations of Pb and Cu were lower with Cap-EDTA application than with Ncap-EDTA. However, shoot dry weight was significantly higher with Cap-EDTA application. Consequently, the Pb and Cu phytoextraction potential of maize significantly increased with Cap-EDTA application compared with the control and Ncap-EDTA application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15226510903390452

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ahmadi A., 2007, Asian J Chem., 19, 187
  2. Welcher FJ., 1965, Analytical uses of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, Z., Wu, L., Chen, N., Liu, C., Zheng, Y., Xu, S., Li, F., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
International Journal of Phytoremediation
Published
2012-09
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
727-740
ISSN
  • 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7879
OpenAlex
W1979906950
Cited by
29
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
phytoextraction, lead contamination, copper contamination, soil remediation, maize, emulsion solvent evaporation, metal mobility, phytotoxicity, plant metal uptake, potentially toxic elements
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Copper, Zea mays, Drug Compounding, Edetic Acid, Lead, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review