Cited by 347Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Sites: Eco-environmental Concerns, Field Studies, Sustainability Issues, and Future Prospects

Saxena, Gaurav, Purchase, Diane, Mulla, Sikandar I., Saratale, Ganesh Dattatraya, Bharagava, Ram Naresh·2019·Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Abstract

Environmental contamination due to heavy metals (HMs) is of serious ecotoxicological concern worldwide because of their increasing use at industries. Due to non-biodegradable and persistent nature, HMs cause serious soil/water pollution and severe health hazards in living beings upon exposure. HMs can be genotoxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic in nature even at low concentration. They may also act as endocrine disruptors and induce developmental as well as neurological disorders, and thus, their removal from our natural environment is crucial for the rehabilitation of contaminated sites. To cope with HM pollution, phytoremediation has emerged as a low-cost and eco-sustainable solution to conventional physicochemical cleanup methods that require high capital investment and labor alter soil properties and disturb soil microflora. Phytoremediation is a green technology wherein plants and associated microbes are used to remediate HM-contaminated sites to safeguard the environment and protect public health. Hence, in view of the above, the present paper aims to examine the feasibility of phytoremediation as a sustainable remediation technology for the management of metal-contaminated sites. Therefore, this paper provides an in-depth review on both the conventional and novel phytoremediation approaches; evaluates their efficacy to remove toxic metals from our natural environment; explores current scientific progresses, field experiences, and sustainability issues; and r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/398_2019_24

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxena, G., Purchase, D., Mulla, S. I., Saratale, G. D., & Bharagava, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN)
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Dongguk University (KR)
Corresponding author
Bharagava, Ram Naresh
Venue
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published
2019
Volume
249
Pages
71-131
ISSN
  • 0179-5953 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-6554
OpenAlex
W2913187714
Cited by
347
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 26
FWCI
46.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
phytoremediation, heavy metal contamination, contaminated site remediation, sustainable remediation, soil and water contamination, plant-microbe interactions, endocrine disruptors, genotoxicity, public health protection
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Plants, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review