Cited by 47Heavy metals in environmentBioenergy crop production and managementEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Viability of Phytoremediation of a Cadmium Contaminated Agricultural Area Using Energy Maize. Part I: Effect on the Farmer's Income

Open access
Thewys, T., Witters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Meers, E., Tack, F. M.G., Vangronsveld, J.·2010·International Journal of Phytoremediation

Abstract

This paper deals with the economic viability of using energy maize as a phytoremediation crop in a vast agricultural area moderately contaminated with metals. The acceptance of phytoremediation as a remediation technology is, besides the extraction rate, determined by its profitability, being the effects it has on the income of the farmer whose land is contaminated. This income can be supported by producing renewable energy through anaerobic digestion of energy maize, a crop that takes up only relatively low amounts of metals, but that can be valorised as a feedstock for energy production. The effect on the income per hectare of growing energy maize instead of fodder maize seems positive, given the most likely values of variables and while keeping the basic income stable, originating from dairy cattle farming activities. We propose growing energy maize aiming at risk-reduction, and generating an alternative income for farmers, yet in the long run also generating a gradual reduction of the pollution levels. In this way, remediation is demoted to a secondary objective with sustainable risk-based land use as primary objective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15226514.2010.493187

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Energy maize production for anaerobic digestion was assessed under two scenarios: the farmer sells energy fodder grown onsite and continues raising cattle fed clean fodder procured offsite; the second scenario adds the potential income of managing a local digester cooperative.

    “Another example is energy maize production for anaerobic digestion under two scenarios; In the first scenario: the farmer will sell energy fodder grown onsite and continue raising cattle fed clean fodder procured offsite [46], and in the second scenario adds the potential income of managing a local digester cooperative, i.e. among a group of farmers [47].”

    From Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few studies focused on post-remediation economics such as the economic viability of contaminated willow biomass pyrolysis, potential farmer's additional income due to selling energy maize fodder to a central anaerobic digestion facility while bearing the cost of fodder maize to feed onsite cattle, compared to the valorisation of a locally-owned plant.

    “Few studies focused on the post-remediation economics such as the economic viability of contaminated willow biomass pyrolysis [45], potential farmer's additional income due to selling energy maize fodder to central anaerobic digestion facility while bearing the cost of fodder maize to feed onsite cattle [46], compared to the valorisation of a locally-owned plant [47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vassilev A, 2002, Bulg J Plant Physiol., 28, 68

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thewys, T., Witters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Meers, E., Tack, F. M. G., & Vangronsveld, J.
Affiliations
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
International Journal of Phytoremediation
Published
2010-09-13
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
650-662
ISSN
  • 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7879
OpenAlex
W2109217350
Cited by
47
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
phytoremediation, cadmium contamination, energy maize, economic feasibility, farm income, anaerobic digestion, renewable energy, fodder maize, dairy cattle farming, contaminated agricultural land, metal-contaminated soil
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Animal Feed, Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Zea mays, Metals, Soil, Trees, Plant Leaves, Plant Shoots, Biomass, Metals, Heavy, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review