The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic Viability of Phytoremediation of a Cadmium Contaminated Agricultural Area Using Energy Maize. Part I: Effect on the Farmer's Income
Open accessAbstract
This paper deals with the economic viability of using energy maize as a phytoremediation crop in a vast agricultural area moderately contaminated with metals. The acceptance of phytoremediation as a remediation technology is, besides the extraction rate, determined by its profitability, being the effects it has on the income of the farmer whose land is contaminated. This income can be supported by producing renewable energy through anaerobic digestion of energy maize, a crop that takes up only relatively low amounts of metals, but that can be valorised as a feedstock for energy production. The effect on the income per hectare of growing energy maize instead of fodder maize seems positive, given the most likely values of variables and while keeping the basic income stable, originating from dairy cattle farming activities. We propose growing energy maize aiming at risk-reduction, and generating an alternative income for farmers, yet in the long run also generating a gradual reduction of the pollution levels. In this way, remediation is demoted to a secondary objective with sustainable risk-based land use as primary objective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Energy maize production for anaerobic digestion was assessed under two scenarios: the farmer sells energy fodder grown onsite and continues raising cattle fed clean fodder procured offsite; the second scenario adds the potential income of managing a local digester cooperative.
“Another example is energy maize production for anaerobic digestion under two scenarios; In the first scenario: the farmer will sell energy fodder grown onsite and continue raising cattle fed clean fodder procured offsite [46], and in the second scenario adds the potential income of managing a local digester cooperative, i.e. among a group of farmers [47].”
From Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFew studies focused on post-remediation economics such as the economic viability of contaminated willow biomass pyrolysis, potential farmer's additional income due to selling energy maize fodder to a central anaerobic digestion facility while bearing the cost of fodder maize to feed onsite cattle, compared to the valorisation of a locally-owned plant.
“Few studies focused on the post-remediation economics such as the economic viability of contaminated willow biomass pyrolysis [45], potential farmer's additional income due to selling energy maize fodder to central anaerobic digestion facility while bearing the cost of fodder maize to feed onsite cattle [46], compared to the valorisation of a locally-owned plant [47].”
From Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phytoremediation of soil metals
Chaney, R. L., Malik, M., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Brewer, E. P., Angle, J. S., & Baker, A. J. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80004-3 · Cited by 1,254
Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field
Vangronsveld, J., Herzig, R., Weyens, N., Boulet, J., Adriaensen, K., Ruttens, A., Thewys, T., Vassilev, A., Meers, E., Nehnevajova, E., et al. (2009) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6 · Cited by 970
Self-citationGarbisu, C., & Alkorta, I. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00108-5 · Cited by 945
A REVIEW ON PHYTOREMEDIATI ON OF HEAVY METALS AND UTILIZATION OF ITS BYPRODUCTS
Ghosh, M. (2005) · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research · doi:10.15666/aeer/0301_001018 · Cited by 910
Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils
McGrath, S. P., Zhao, F. J., & Lombi, E. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1010358708525 · Cited by 543
Vangronsveld, J., Assche, F. V., & Clijsters, H. M. M. (1995) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(99)80007-4 · Cited by 341
Self-citationMeers, E., Slycken, S. V., Adriaensen, K., Ruttens, A., Vangronsveld, J., Laing, G. D., Witters, N., Thewys, T., & Tack, F. M. G. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.015 · Cited by 277
Self-citationPhytoextraction: a review on enhanced metal availability and plant accumulation
do Nascimento, C. W. A., & Xing, B. (2006) · Scientia Agricola · doi:10.1590/s0103-90162006000300014 · Cited by 244
PHYTOREMEDIATION FOR HEAVY METAL‐CONTAMINATED SOILS COMBINED WITH BIOENERGY PRODUCTION
Ginneken, L. V., Meers, E., Guisson, R., Ruttens, A., Elst, K., Tack, F. M. G., Vangronsveld, J., Diels, L., & Dejonghe, W. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management · doi:10.3846/16486897.2007.9636935 · Cited by 237
Self-citationHogervorst, J. G. F., Plusquin, M., Vangronsveld, J., Nawrot, T. S., Cuypers, A., Hecke, É. V., Roels, H. A., Carleer, R., & Staessen, J. A. (2006) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.009 · Cited by 228
Self-citationPhytoextraction of metals from soils: How far from practice?
Nevel, L. V., Mertens, J., Oorts, K., & Verheyen, K. (2007) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.05.024 · Cited by 221
Meers, E., Ruttens, A., Hopgood, M. J., Lesage, E., & Tack, F. M. G. (2005) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.026 · Cited by 215
Self-citationPhytoextraction: an assessment of biogeochemical and economic viability
Robinson, B. H., Fernández, J. E., Madejón, P., Marañón, T., Carpio, J. M. M., Green, S., & Clothier, B. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1022586524971 · Cited by 186
Assessment of the phytoextraction potential of high biomass crop plants
Hernández-Allica, J., Becerril, J. M., & Garbisu, C. (2007) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.002 · Cited by 171
The Use of Plants for Remediation of Metal-Contaminated Soils
Vassilev, A., Schwitzguébel, J., Thewys, T., van der Lelie, D., & Vangronsveld, J. (2004) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2004.2 · Cited by 170
Self-citationMeers, E., Lamsal, S. P., Vervaeke, P., Hopgood, M. J., Lust, N., & Tack, F. M. G. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.12.019 · Cited by 123
Self-citationMeers, E., Tack, F. M. G., Slycken, S. V., Ruttens, A., Laing, G. D., Vangronsveld, J., & Verloo, M. G. (2008) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226510802100515 · Cited by 112
Self-citationZhang, Y., & Banks, C. J. (2006) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.011 · Cited by 90
Witters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Adriaensen, K., Meers, E., Meiresonne, L., Tack, F. M. G., Thewys, T., Laes, E., & Vangronsveld, J. (2009) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-009-9042-1 · Cited by 88
Self-citationCADMIUM PHYTOEXTRACTION: PRESENT STATE, BIOLOGICAL BACKGROUNDS AND RESEARCH NEEDS
Vassilev, A., Vangronsveld, J., Yordanov, I., & Popov, M. (2002) · Cited by 58
Self-citationCombining biomass production with phytoextraction of Cd and Zn on moderately contaminated sites
Meers, E., Tack, F. M. G., Meiresonne, L., Ruttens, A., & Vangronsveld, J. (2006) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 8
Self-citationMeers, E., Slycken, S. V., Ruttens, A., Meiresonne, L., Vangronsveld, J., Thewys, T., & Tack, F. M. G. (2007) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Vassilev A, 2002, Bulg J Plant Physiol., 28, 68
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Witters, N., Mendelsohn, R. O., Van Slycken, S., Weyens, N., Schreurs, E., Meers, E., Tack, F., Carleer, R., & Vangronsveld, J. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.08.016 · Cited by 151
Self-citationRuttens, A., Boulet, J., Weyens, N., Smeets, K., Adriaensen, K., Meers, E., Van Slycken, S., Tack, F., Meiresonne, L., Thewys, T., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2011.568543 · Cited by 139
Self-citationWitters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Adriaensen, K., Meers, E., Meiresonne, L., Tack, F. M. G., Thewys, T., Laes, E., & Vangronsveld, J. (2009) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-009-9042-1 · Cited by 88
Self-citationVan Slycken, S., Witters, N., Meiresonne, L., Meers, E., Ruttens, A., Van Peteghem, P., Weyens, N., Tack, F. M. G., & Vangronsveld, J. (2013) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2012.723070 · Cited by 75
Self-citationThewys, T., Witters, N., Meers, E., & Vangronsveld, J. (2010) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2010.493188 · Cited by 43
Self-citationAlshehri, K., Gao, Z., Harbottle, M., Sapsford, D., & Cleall, P. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20632 · Cited by 32
“…under two scenarios; In the first scenario: the farmer will sell energy fodder grown onsite and continue raising cattle fed clean fodder procured offsite [46], and in the second scenario adds the potential income of managing a local digester cooperative, i.e. among a group of farmers [47].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Thewys, T., Witters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Meers, E., Tack, F. M. G., & Vangronsveld, J.
- Affiliations
- Hasselt University (BE)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Phytoremediation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 650-662
- ISSN
- 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7879
- OpenAlex
- W2109217350
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- biblio.ugent.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Phytoremediation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- phytoremediation, cadmium contamination, energy maize, economic feasibility, farm income, anaerobic digestion, renewable energy, fodder maize, dairy cattle farming, contaminated agricultural land, metal-contaminated soil
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Animal Feed, Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Zea mays, Metals, Soil, Trees, Plant Leaves, Plant Shoots, Biomass, Metals, Heavy, Environmental Restoration and Remediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review