The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Germline CRISPR-Cas Modification: Toward a Regulatory Framework
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The temporal and possibly generational spread of risk may require a higher standard of informed consent for i-HGE research that results in gene-edited humans coming into existence.
“This temporal and possibly generational spread of risk may require a higher standard of informed consent for i-HGE research that results in gene-edited humans coming into existence (Evitt et al. 2015).”
From Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic (2023) · cites this paper as Evitt et al. 2015
Parents are often allowed to provide consent for medical procedures on behalf of their children.
“parents are often allowed to provide consent for medical procedures on behalf of their children (Evitt et al. 2015, p. 27).”
From Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic (2023) · cites this paper as Evitt et al. 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Ran, F. A., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Scott, D. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Kriz, A. J., Zetsche, B., Shalem, O., Wu, X., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14299 · Cited by 2,687
A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification
Baltimore, D., Berg, P., Botchan, M., Carroll, D., Charo, R. A., Church, G., Corn, J. E., Daley, G. Q., Doudna, J. A., Fenner, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1028 · Cited by 733
Don’t edit the human germ line
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., & Smolenski, J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/519410a · Cited by 530
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1038/nbt.3227 · DOI
- Collins F. S., 2015, Statement on NIH funding of research using gene-editing technologies in human embryos
- 10.7554/eLife.03401 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMp1506446 · DOI
- 10.1038/522020a · DOI
- 10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00001813-200511000-00003 · DOI
- 10.1353/ken.0.0091 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.348.6237.871-a · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2843 · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2014.160 · DOI · Paper page
- Zimmerman A. B., 2009, Journal of Health and Biomedical Law, 5, 309
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic
Ranisch, R., Trettenbach, K., & Arnason, G. (2023) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10115-x · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Evitt, N. H., Mascharak, S., & Altman, R. B.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-12-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 25-29
- ISSN
- 1526-5161
- 1536-0075
- PMC
- PMC4699477
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
