Cited by 1,135CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringAnimal Genetics and ReproductionRNA regulation and disease

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes

Open access
Liang, Puping, Xu, Yanwen, Zhang, Xiya, Ding, Chenhui, Huang, Rui, Zhang, Zhen, Lv, Jie, Xie, Xiaowei +8 more·2015·Protein & Cell

Abstract

Genome editing tools such as the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated system (Cas) have been widely used to modify genes in model systems including animal zygotes and human cells, and hold tremendous promise for both basic research and clinical applications. To date, a serious knowledge gap remains in our understanding of DNA repair mechanisms in human early embryos, and in the efficiency and potential off-target effects of using technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 in human pre-implantation embryos. In this report, we used tripronuclear (3PN) zygotes to further investigate CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human cells. We found that CRISPR/Cas9 could effectively cleave the endogenous β-globin gene (HBB). However, the efficiency of homologous recombination directed repair (HDR) of HBB was low and the edited embryos were mosaic. Off-target cleavage was also apparent in these 3PN zygotes as revealed by the T7E1 assay and whole-exome sequencing. Furthermore, the endogenous delta-globin gene (HBD), which is homologous to HBB, competed with exogenous donor oligos to act as the repair template, leading to untoward mutations. Our data also indicated that repair of the HBB locus in these embryos occurred preferentially through the non-crossover HDR pathway. Taken together, our work highlights the pressing need to further improve the fidelity and specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 platform, a prerequisite for any clinical applications of CRSIPR/Cas9-mediated editing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reported efficiencies of repair with templates in human embryos are very low.

    “Of the studies that have been conducted, the reported efficiencies of repair with templates in human embryos are very low (5,7,8).”
  • Current clinical trials using the CRISPR platform aim to improve CAR T-cell effectiveness, treat sickle cell disease and other inherited blood disorders, and stop or reverse eye disease.

    “Current clinical trials using the CRISPR platform aim to improve chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell effectiveness, treat sickle cell disease and other inherited blood disorders, and stop or reverse eye disease 109 .”

    From The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing (2020) · cites this paper as [109]

    The Abstract and Results describe CRISPR/Cas9 editing of HBB in human cells and tripronuclear zygotes, not clinical trials. Searches for CAR T cells, sickle cell disease, inherited blood disorders, and eye disease found no passage describing the claimed trial aims. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, P., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, C., Huang, R., Zhang, Z., Lv, J., Xie, X., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Sun, Y., Bai, Y., Songyang, Z., Ma, W., Zhou, C., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Canquan
  • Huang, Junjiu
Venue
Protein & Cell
Published
2015-04-18
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
363-372
ISSN
  • 1674-800X (ISSN-L)
  • 1674-8018
OpenAlex
W2141825721
Cited by
1,135
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 102 · 2013: 1
FWCI
81.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein & Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91019020, 973 Program, 31371508, 81330055, 2010CB945401)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2010CB945401, 2012CB911201)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, preimplantation embryo, homologous recombination repair, off-target cleavage, HBB, HBD, embryo mosaicism, DNA repair mechanisms, beta-globin
MeSH terms
Blastocyst, Hemoglobins, Abnormal, Humans, Zygote, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review