CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eco- and Genotoxicological Assessments of Two Reactive Textile Dyes

Leme, Daniela Morais, Oliveira, Gisele Augusto Rodrigues de, Meireles, Gabriela, Brito, Lara Barroso, Rodrigues, Laís de Brito, Palma de Oliveira, Danielle·2015·Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
DOI 10.1080/15287394.2014.971208
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Contamination of natural waters has been one of the major problems of modern society and the textile industry is rated as an important polluting source, due to the generation of large amounts of wastewaters. The aim of this study was to assess textile dyes Reactive Blue 19 (RB19, anthraquinone dye) and Reactive Red 120 (RR120, azo dye) in terms of the potential to induce adverse effects on aquatic organisms and humans. Thus, these dyes were tested using the following assays: Microtox assay (Vibrio fischeri); brine shrimp (Artemia salina); Daphnia similis; and Comet with normal human dermal fibroblasts as well as Ames test (TA98, TA100, YG1041, YG1042--with and without S9). RB19 was relatively nontoxic to all aquatic bioindicators analyzed with an EC50 of more than 100 mg/L, whereas RR120 was only moderately toxic to A. salina with a EC50-48h of 81.89 mg/L. Mutagenicity through base pair substitution was observed with RB19 in the presence of S9 (Ames-positive). The comet assay did not demonstrate any apparent genotoxic effects for any tested dye. Although mutagenicity was detected with RB19, the mutagenic effect observed may be considered weak compared to the ability to induce DNA damage by other classes of dyes such as disperse dyes. Therefore, these dyes may be classified as nonmutagens (RR120) or weak mutagens (RB19) and relatively nontoxic for aquatic organisms. However, it is noteworthy that the weak acute toxicity to A. salina induced by RR120 is sufficient to suggest po…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15287394.2014.971208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although anthraquinone on its own is not toxic, some AQ dyes as well as their degradation intermediates (often unidentified) can be potentially toxic, few are mutagenic and/or potentially carcinogenic.

    “Although anthraquinone on its own is not toxic 23 , research has shown that some AQ dyes as well as their degradation intermediates (often unidentified), can be potentially toxic, few of them are mutagenic and/or potentially carcinogenic 26, 87-90 .”

    From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [90]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00233-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10661-012-2794-7 · DOI
  3. Azur Environmental, 1999, Microtox Acute Toxicity Test Guide, Users Manual. Carlsbad, USA
  4. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.10.015 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0165-1161(82)90026-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.09.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/15287394.2013.843068 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00128-004-0508-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0043-1354(90)90052-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.106 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.066 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.042 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.033 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90044-A · DOI
  16. Claxton L. D., 1991, II. With exogenous activation. Mutat Res., 253, 149
  17. 10.1289/ehp.1002336 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.01.017 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s002270000306 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.038 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/tox.20576 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.063 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.033 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.013 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/15287390801985869 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/15287394.2012.675309 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00302-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00244-008-9263-x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0165-1161(93)90157-U · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.138 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.019 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.027 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.03.005 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00067-7 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/etc.5620131008 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.015 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.06.005 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.002 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00866-X · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.047 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/em.20224 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00064-6 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1021/es061020p · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.09.008 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.09.001 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.036 · DOI
  53. Patlolla A., 2010, Ethnicity Disease, 20, 1
  54. 10.1590/S0100-40422005000100022 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.049 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/2190-4715-26-1 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00521-8 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.01.015 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.07.006 · DOI
  61. Soni P., 2006, J. Environ. Biol., 27, 623
  62. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.04.006 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2003.09.008 · DOI
  64. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::AID-EM8>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.06.020 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.09.009 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.100 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.019 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04617-A · DOI
  70. 10.1177/0748233708095769 · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01131.x · DOI
  72. 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00086-8 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90195-N · DOI
  74. Wollin K.-M., 2004, J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 23, 267

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leme, D. M., Oliveira, G. A. R. D., Meireles, G., Brito, L. B., Rodrigues, L. D. B., & Palma de Oliveira, D.
Venue
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
287-300
ISSN
  • 1528-7394
  • 1087-2620
DOI
10.1080/15287394.2014.971208
Cited by
63
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review