The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine as a urinary biomarker of oxidative DNA damage
Abstract
Living organisms are continuously exposed to reactive oxygen species as a consequence of biochemical reactions as well as external factors. Oxidative DNA damage has been implicated in aging, carcinogenesis and other degenerative diseases. The urinary excretion of the DNA repair product 8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8OHdG) has been proposed as a noninvasive biomarker of oxidative DNA damage in humans in vivo. We have developed a three‐dimensional HPLC analysis with electrochemical detection for the analysis of 8OHdG in urine and studied factors affecting the excretion of this biomarker in 83 healthy humans and in various laboratory animals, including dog, pig, and rat. Previously, other groups have used comparable HPLC methods or gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry with selective ion monitoring for measuring the excretion of 8OHdG in humans, rats, mice, and monkeys. In the 169 humans studied so far, the average 8OHdG excretion was 200–300 pmol/kg per 24 h with a sevenfold range, and the coefficient of variation was 30–40%. This excretion corresponds 140–200 oxidative modification of guanine bases per cell per day. Thirty‐two smokers from our study population excreted 50% (31–69%; 95% confidence interval) more 8OHdG than 53 nonsmokers. This indicates a 50% increased rate of oxidative DNA damage from smoking, adding to the other well‐known health hazards of smoking. The biochemical‐physiological basis is unknown but may be related to smoke constituents including or generating reactive oxygen species and/or consuming antioxidants and/or the well‐known enhancing effect of smoking on the metabolic rate. In our 83 healthy subjects the 8OHdG excretion correlated with body composition. Thus, lean and/or male subjects excreted more than obese and/or female subjects, possibly related to differences in metabolic rate. In accordance, the excretion of 8OHdG decreased after calorie restriction, which will cause a decline in the metabolic rate. Across the investigated species, humans, dogs, pigs, and rats, the excretion of 8OHdG correlated with the specific metabolic rate, confirming data from other groups on humans, monkeys, rats, and mice. The excretion of 8OHdG decreased with age in rats in parallel with the decline in metabolic rate with advancing age. The excretion of 8OHdG reflects the formation and repair of only one out of approximately 20 described oxidative DNA modifications. So far, methods are not available for the determination of the corresponding repair products, except 8OHdG and thymidine glycol, in urine. Moreover, the importance in terms of mutagenicity, particularly regarding tumour supressor genes and oncogenes, is mainly documented for 8OHdG in DNA. In mammalian cells an excission repair enzyme complex for 8OHdG has been demonstrated, but whether the main product is 8OHdG or the base is yet unknown. In addition, 8OHdG may derive from DNA during turnover of mitochondria and cells as well as from oxidation in the deoxynucleotide and deoxynucleoside pools that provide building blocks for new DNA. Thus, the excretion of 8OHdG will reflect the general average risk of promutagenic oxidative adducts in DNA of all tissues and organs. We suggest that the individual variation in the apparent massive extent of oxidative DNA‐damage in humans predicts the rate of aging and the risk of cancer as well as other degenerative diseases. The use of 8OHdG and similar urinary biomarker of oxidative DNA damage offers a valuable tool for testing such hypotheses in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Tissue Destruction by Neutrophils
Epstein, F. H., & Weiss, S. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198902093200606 · Cited by 3,950
Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG
Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M., & Grollman, A. P. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349431a0 · Cited by 2,224
Cited by
Valavanidis, A., Vlahogianni, T., Dassenakis, M., & Scoullos, M. (2006) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.013 · Cited by 1,795
Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants in human health and disease
Aruoma, O. I. (1998) · Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society · doi:10.1007/s11746-998-0032-9 · Cited by 1,682
Wu, L. L., Chiou, C.-C., Chang, P.-Y., & Wu, J. T. (2004) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cccn.2003.09.010 · Cited by 990
Kell, D. B. (2009) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-2-2 · Cited by 554
Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo
Banza Lubaba Nkulu, C., Casas, L., Haufroid, V., De Putter, T., Saenen, N. D., Kayembe-Kitenge, T., Musa Obadia, P., Kyanika Wa Mukoma, D., Lunda Ilunga, J.-M., Nawrot, T. S., et al. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0139-4 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Loft, S., Fischer‐Nielsen, A., Jeding, I. B., Vistisen, K., & Poulsen, H. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 391-404
- ISSN
- 0098-4108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980526497
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine as a urinary biomarker of oxidative DNA damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15287399309531806
- The paper
- Loft, S., Fischer‐Nielsen, A., Jeding, I. B., Vistisen, K., & Poulsen, H. E. (1993). 8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine as a urinary biomarker of oxidative DNA damage. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287399309531806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.