Cited by 537Mining and Resource ManagementHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHeavy metals in environment

Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo

Open access
Banza Lubaba Nkulu, Célestin, Casas, Lidia, Haufroid, Vincent, De Putter, Thierry, Saenen, Nelly D., Kayembe-Kitenge, Tony, Musa Obadia, Paul, Kyanika Wa Mukoma, Daniel +5 more·2018·Nature Sustainability

Abstract

The sustainability of cobalt is an important emerging issue because this critical base metal is an essential component of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. More than half the world's cobalt mine production comes from the Katanga Copperbelt in DR Congo, with a substantial proportion (estimated at 15-20%) being extracted by artisanal miners. Here we show, in a case study performed in the town of Kolwezi, that people living in a neighbourhood that had been transformed into an artisanal cobalt mine, had much higher levels of cobalt in urine and blood than people living in a nearby control area. The differences were most pronounced for children, in whom we also found evidence of exposure-related oxidative DNA damage. It was already known that industrial mining and processing of metals have led to severe environmental pollution in the region. This field study provides novel and robust empirical evidence that the artisanal extraction of cobalt that prevails in the DR Congo may cause toxic harm to vulnerable communities. This strengthens the conclusion that the currently existing cobalt supply chain is not sustainable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41893-018-0139-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extensive exploitation of Li resources raises concerns about its environmental impacts.

    “While the primary aim of using Li in electric vehicles is to improve the sustainability of transportation (Agrawal and Rajapatel 2020, Wang et al 2023), the extensive exploitation of Li resources, raises concerns about its environmental impacts (Agusdinata et al 2018, Banza Lubaba Nkulu et al 2018).”

    From Environmental impacts of lithium supply chains from Australia to China (2024) · cites this paper as Banza Lubaba Nkulu et al 2018

    The Abstract and Discussion link cobalt to lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and document environmental degradation from cobalt mining in DR Congo. They do not examine exploitation of lithium resources or its environmental impacts; the source supports the concern for a related battery material, not Li itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) 2015 TLVs® and BEIs®. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents. Biological Exposure Indices 2015
  2. [27]Lison D Cobalt Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals (4th Edition). Volume II: Specific Metals Nordberg GF Fowler BA Nordberg M Academic Press - Elsevier 2015 743 763

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banza Lubaba Nkulu, C., Casas, L., Haufroid, V., De Putter, T., Saenen, N. D., Kayembe-Kitenge, T., Musa Obadia, P., Kyanika Wa Mukoma, D., Lunda Ilunga, J.-M., Nawrot, T. S., Luboya Numbi, O., Smolders, E., & Nemery, B.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Nature Sustainability
Published
2018-09-14
Volume
1
Issue
9
Pages
495-504
ISSN
2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889657886
Cited by
537
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
FWCI
28.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad (ZRDC2015PR090)
  • Vlaamse regering
  • VLIRUOS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
cobalt exposure, oxidative DNA damage, child health, Kolwezi, lithium-ion batteries, critical metals, environmental pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review