Cited by 154Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Self-concept Clarity in Relationship Quality

Abstract

Previous research has linked self-concept clarity to positive outcomes (Campbell et al., 1996 Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F. and Lehmann, D. R. 1996. Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 141–156. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), but has not systematically explored its potential positive association with relationship quality. The current set of studies hypothesizes that self-concept clarity will positively correlate with relationship satisfaction and commitment, and that inclusion of other in the self and self-esteem will mediate the association. Study 1 examined correlations between self-report measures from 199 undergraduates, while Study 2 randomly assigned 78 undergraduates to either engage in a self-concept clarity or self-concept confusion manipulation. As hypothesized, in both studies, higher self-concept clarity was associated with higher relationship satisfaction and commitment. Inclusion of other in the self and self-esteem mediated the association between self-concept clarity and relationship quality measures (the only exception was for self-esteem and commitment in Study 1). These results demonstrate how a person's self-concept relates to romantic relationship quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15298860903332191

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with high self-concept clarity are more likely to understand their own needs, values, and goals, actively seek social support and interactions, which increases relationship stability and quality, and ultimately reduces feelings of loneliness.

    “Individuals with high self-concept clarity are more likely to understand their own needs, values, and goals, actively seek social support and interactions, which increases relationship stability and quality, and ultimately reduces feelings of loneliness [10].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177 · DOI
  2. Altman I., 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships
  3. Aron A., 2003, Handbook of self and identity, 442
  4. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00103.x · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0146167201279011 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1062 · DOI
  11. 10.1521/jscp.20.3.396.22302 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/10357-003 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/10458-007 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8956-9_1 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/1467-9280.00415 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004 · DOI
  20. Flett G. L., 2003, Love, romance, sexual attraction: Research perspectives from current psychology, 31
  21. Gagne F., 2004, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322, 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/01461672012710003 · DOI
  23. Hansson R. O., 1984, Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 265
  24. 10.1353/sof.2005.0103 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.58 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.35 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/per.2410080302 · DOI
  29. Jones E. E., 1987, Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, 79
  30. 10.1111/1475-6811.00035 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Leary M., 2003, Handbook of self and identity
  33. Mashek D. J., 2003, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 382, 10.1177/0146167202250220 · DOI
  34. Mashek D. J., 2004, Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 343, 10.4324/9781410610010 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/0146167201274004 · DOI
  37. 10.1515/9781400876136 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/2786859 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1521/jscp.1995.14.3.244 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.769 · DOI
  44. Stafford L., 2003, Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations, 58
  45. 10.1111/1475-6811.00022 · DOI
  46. Van Lange P. A. M., 1995, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 32, 10.1177/0146167295211005 · DOI
  47. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lewandowski, G. W., Nardone, N., & Raines, A. J.
Affiliations
Monmouth University (US)
Corresponding author
Lewandowski, Gary W.
Venue
Self and Identity
Published
2009-10-31
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
416-433
ISSN
  • 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8876
OpenAlex
W2048261458
Cited by
154
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
self-concept clarity, relationship quality, romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, self-esteem, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review