The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Self-concept Clarity in Relationship Quality
Abstract
Previous research has linked self-concept clarity to positive outcomes (Campbell et al., 1996 Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F. and Lehmann, D. R. 1996. Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 141–156. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), but has not systematically explored its potential positive association with relationship quality. The current set of studies hypothesizes that self-concept clarity will positively correlate with relationship satisfaction and commitment, and that inclusion of other in the self and self-esteem will mediate the association. Study 1 examined correlations between self-report measures from 199 undergraduates, while Study 2 randomly assigned 78 undergraduates to either engage in a self-concept clarity or self-concept confusion manipulation. As hypothesized, in both studies, higher self-concept clarity was associated with higher relationship satisfaction and commitment. Inclusion of other in the self and self-esteem mediated the association between self-concept clarity and relationship quality measures (the only exception was for self-esteem and commitment in Study 1). These results demonstrate how a person's self-concept relates to romantic relationship quality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with high self-concept clarity are more likely to understand their own needs, values, and goals, actively seek social support and interactions, which increases relationship stability and quality, and ultimately reduces feelings of loneliness.
“Individuals with high self-concept clarity are more likely to understand their own needs, values, and goals, actively seek social support and interactions, which increases relationship stability and quality, and ultimately reduces feelings of loneliness [10].”
From Self-Concept Clarity and Loneliness among College Students: The Chain-Mediating Effect of Fear of Negative Evaluation and Self-Disclosure (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries
Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141 · Cited by 2,088
Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586 · Cited by 1,435 · cited 2×
“…within the relationship (Rusbult, 1983), trust (Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998), relationship closeness (Miller, 1997), partner forgiveness (McCullough et al., 1998), and pro-relationship behaviors, such as accommodation and willingness to sacrifice for the partner (Wieselquist, Rusbult,…”
BackgroundCognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships.
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939 · Cited by 718
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177 · DOI
- Altman I., 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships
- Aron A., 2003, Handbook of self and identity, 442
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00103.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167201279011 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1062 · DOI
- 10.1521/jscp.20.3.396.22302 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/10357-003 · DOI
- 10.1037/10458-007 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-8956-9_1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00415 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004 · DOI
- Flett G. L., 2003, Love, romance, sexual attraction: Research perspectives from current psychology, 31
- Gagne F., 2004, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322, 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1 · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672012710003 · DOI
- Hansson R. O., 1984, Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 265
- 10.1353/sof.2005.0103 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.58 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.35 · DOI
- 10.1002/per.2410080302 · DOI
- Jones E. E., 1987, Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, 79
- 10.1111/1475-6811.00035 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Leary M., 2003, Handbook of self and identity
- Mashek D. J., 2003, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 382, 10.1177/0146167202250220 · DOI
- Mashek D. J., 2004, Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 343, 10.4324/9781410610010 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167201274004 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400876136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · DOI
- 10.2307/2786859 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/jscp.1995.14.3.244 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.769 · DOI
- Stafford L., 2003, Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations, 58
- 10.1111/1475-6811.00022 · DOI
- Van Lange P. A. M., 1995, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 32, 10.1177/0146167295211005 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development
Avci, H., Baams, L., & Kretschmer, T. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1 · Cited by 104
Pang, T., Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14030194 · Cited by 28
Quinones, C., & Kakabadse, N. K. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.038 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowski, G. W., Nardone, N., & Raines, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Monmouth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewandowski, Gary W.
- Venue
- Self and Identity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 416-433
- ISSN
- 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8876
- OpenAlex
- W2048261458
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- self-concept clarity, relationship quality, romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, self-esteem, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review