Cited by 34Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Neuropsychological characteristics of highly dissociative healthy individuals

Amrhein, Christine, Hengmith, Simone, Maragkos, Markos, Hennig-Fast, Kristina·2008·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dissociative disorders are characterized by disturbances in several neuropsychological domains, especially attention, memory, and consciousness. As a tendency to dissociate can also be observed in healthy individuals, and may be a risk factor for the development of dissociative disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), we were interested in the neuropsychological characteristics of these participants. METHOD: We examined attention, memory, and executive control functions in 17 high and 17 low dissociators without any psychiatric or neurological disorder and without prior experiences of trauma. RESULTS: High dissociators showed relative performance deficiencies in tasks of memory for associative, context-dependent verbal material, visuospatial working memory, and executive control functions in terms of a heightened perseveration tendency and false positive errors. CONCLUSION: These cognitive deficits are consistent with models of dissociative disorders and dissociation in PTSD assuming a hippocampal and prefrontal dysfunction as a core factor. Mild cognitive impairments in otherwise healthy high dissociators may constitute a risk factor for the development of later PTSD or dissociative disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299730802226332

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amrhein, C., Hengmith, S., Maragkos, M., & Hennig-Fast, K.
Affiliations
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2008-09-19
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
525-542
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W1996773006
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
dissociation, dissociative disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, attention, memory, executive function, working memory, perseveration, hippocampal dysfunction, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, risk factors, healthy individuals
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review