Cited by 211Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Emotional Dissociation in Response to Trauma: An Information-Processing Approach

Foa, Edna B., Hearst-Ikeda, Diana·1996·Handbook of Dissociation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-0310-5_10

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foa, E. B., & Hearst-Ikeda, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Handbook of Dissociation
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1996
Pages
207-224
OpenAlex
W73273148
Cited by
210
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
24.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive avoidance, numbing, denial, hyperarousal, self-preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review