Cited by 37Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchCrime Patterns and Interventions

PTSD and dissociation symptoms as mediators of the relationship between polyvictimization and psychosocial and behavioral problems among justice-involved adolescents

Ford, Julian D., Charak, Ruby, Modrowski, Crosby A., Kerig, Patricia K.·2018·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

Polyvictimization (PV) has been shown to be associated with psychosocial and behavioral impairment in community and high risk populations, including youth involved in juvenile justice. However, the mechanisms accounting for these adverse outcomes have not been empirically delineated. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dissociation are documented sequelae of PV and are associated with a wide range of behavioral/emotional problems. This study used a cross-sectional research design and bootstrapped multiple mediation analyses with self-report measures completed by a large sample of justice-involved youth (N = 809, ages 12-19 years old, 27% female, 46.5% youth of color) to test the hypothesis that PTSD and dissociation symptoms mediate the relationship between PV and problems with anger, depression/anxiety, alcohol/drug use, and somatic complaints after controlling for the effects of exposure to violence and adversities related to juvenile justice involvement. As hypothesized, PTSD symptoms mediated the relationship of PV with all outcomes except alcohol/drug use problems (which had an unmediated direct association with PV). Partially supporting study hypotheses, dissociation symptoms mediated the relationship between PV and internalizing problems (i.e., depression anxiety; suicide ideation). Implications are discussed for prospective research demarcating the mechanisms linking PV and adverse outcomes in juvenile justice and other high risk populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2018.1441354

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J. D., Charak, R., Modrowski, C. A., & Kerig, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
  • The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2018-03-16
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
325-346
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2793475919
Cited by
37
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ([1U79SM080044-01])
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
polyvictimization, post-traumatic stress disorder, adolescents, mediation, internalizing problems, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, anger problems, alcohol and drug use, somatic symptoms, violence exposure, psychosocial problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Utah, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review