Cited by 300Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Emotional Processing Theory (EPT) and Exposure Therapy for PTSD

Rauch, Sheila, Foa, Edna·2006·Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10879-006-9008-y

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauch, S., & Foa, E.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Rauch, Sheila
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
Published
2006-06
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
61-65
ISSN
  • 0022-0116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3564
OpenAlex
W2159122273
Cited by
300
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional processing theory, post-traumatic stress disorder, exposure therapy, trauma-focused psychotherapy, anxiety disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review