Cited by 93Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging and Gerontology ResearchNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

REPRINTS: Effects of an Intergenerational Health Promotion Program for Older Adults in Japan

Fujiwara, Yoshinori, Sakuma, Naoko, Ohba, Hiromi, Nishi, Mariko, Lee, Sangyoon, Watanabe, Naoki, Kousa, Yoko, Yoshida, Hiroto +7 more·2009·Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Abstract

We launched a new intervention study called REPRINTS in which senior volunteers engaged in reading picture books to children. Sixty-nine volunteers and 72 participants in a control group, all aged 60 years and over, living in three urban locations, participated in a baseline health checkup in June 2004. After completion of a three-month training seminar, volunteers visited public elementary schools and kindergartens in groups of 6 to 10 for an 18 month period. They were assessed again by a follow-up health checkup in March 2006. At the follow-up, social network scores (frequency of contact with grandchildren and others around the neighborhood) and self-rated health improved or was maintained at a significantly higher rate for the 37 individuals volunteering most intensively as compared to those who did not volunteer or volunteered minimally. In conclusion, through intensively being engaged in the intergenerational volunteer programs during 21 months, self-rated health and social networks were more likely to improve or be maintained among senior volunteers than controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15350770802628901

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the volunteer reading study, the quantity of and amount of contact with friends or neighbours did not change, but the level of social support received from them reduced and the level of social support provided by participants increased.

    “While the quantity of and amount of contact with friends or neighbours did not change, the level of social support received from them reduced and the level of social support provided by participants increased.”
  • In the volunteer reading study, follow-up assessments at 21 months were restricted to volunteers (37/67) participating in more than a few sessions every month, and to two outcomes of self-rated health and frequency of communication with children contacted through volunteer activities.

    “Follow-up assessments at 21 months were restricted to volunteers (37/67) participating in “more than a few sessions every month”, and to two outcomes of self-rated health and frequency of communication with children contacted through volunteer activities.”
  • Community-dwelling older people who volunteered to read books to school children reported increased frequency of communication with children contacted through volunteer activities at nine months.

    “Community-dwelling older people who volunteered to read books to school children [74] unsurprisingly reported increased frequency of communication with children contacted through volunteer activities at nine months.”
  • Participants in the volunteer reading study also reported increased contact with grandchildren and distant friends, and improved self-rated health compared with controls.

    “Participants also reported increased contact with grandchildren and distant friends, and improved self-rated health compared with controls.”
  • In the volunteer reading study, significant between-group differences favouring the intervention were observed for self-rated health and frequency of communication with children at 21 months.

    “Significant between-group differences favouring the intervention were observed for both outcomes, but these must be interpreted with caution due to the selective nature of participants followed up.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujiwara, Y., Sakuma, N., Ohba, H., Nishi, M., Lee, S., Watanabe, N., Kousa, Y., Yoshida, H., Fukaya, T., Yajima, S., Amano, H., Kureta, Y., Ishii, K., Uchida, H., & Shinkai, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
  • University of Hyogo (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujiwara, Yoshinori
Venue
Journal of Intergenerational Relationships
Published
2009-03-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
17-39
ISSN
  • 1535-0770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-0932
OpenAlex
W2032661606
Cited by
93
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Intergenerational Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
older adults, elderly volunteers, social networks, self-rated health, grandparent-grandchild relationships, health checkups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review