Cited by 88Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Changes in loneliness during middle childhood predict risk for adolescent suicidality indirectly through mental health problems

Jones, Angela C., Schinka, Katherine C., van Dulmen, Manfred H. M., Bossarte, Robert M., Swahn, Monica H.·2011·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

We investigated whether changes in loneliness during middle childhood as well as from middle childhood into adolescence were associated with adolescent self-harm behaviors and suicidal thoughts using a community sample of 889 participants. Multivariate logistic regressions indicate that the relationship between changes in loneliness and suicidality is no longer statistically significant once depression and externalizing behavior problems are included as controls. Follow-up analyses indicate that increases in loneliness indirectly affect self-harm behaviors and suicidal thoughts through depression and externalizing behavior problems. These findings are consistent with other studies on peer relationships and adolescent suicidality, suggesting that experiences with peers indirectly affect risk for suicidality through mental health problems. These findings highlight the importance of considering how experiences in middle childhood peer relationships affect risk for suicide in consecutive developmental periods, particularly adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2011.614585

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in loneliness reported in middle childhood is predictive of depression in adolescence.

    “Data from a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) study demonstrated that an increase in loneliness reported in middle childhood is predictive of depression in adolescence (Jones et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, A. C., Schinka, K. C., van Dulmen, M. H. M., Bossarte, R. M., & Swahn, M. H.
Affiliations
  • John Carroll University (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2011-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
818-824
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2033641317
Cited by
88
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01CE001395)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
loneliness, middle childhood, adolescence, adolescent suicidality, suicidal ideation, self-harm, depression, externalizing problems, peer relationships, developmental changes, indirect effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Male, Mental Health, Peer Group, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review