Cited by 33Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Frequency of S492R mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor: analysis of plasma DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab or cetuximab monotherapy

Open access
Price, Timothy, Ang, Agnes, Boedigheimer, Michael, Kim, Tae Won, Li, Jin, Cascinu, Stefano, Ruff, Paul, Satya Suresh, Attili +3 more·2020·Cancer Biology & Therapy

Abstract

Background Antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, and cetuximab, a human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody, have shown clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the phase 3 noninferiority ASPECCT (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01001377) study, panitumumab was demonstrated to be noninferior to cetuximab and provided a similar overall survival benefit for patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC. However, some patients eventually develop resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. EGFR p.S492R mutation was previously identified as conferring resistance to cetuximab, but not to panitumumab.Methods This biomarker study analyzed plasma samples from ASPECCT collected at both baseline and posttreatment.Results No EGFR p.S492R mutations were identified at baseline; however, after treatment the EGFR p.S492R mutation was detected in 1% of patients treated with panitumumab versus 16% of those treated with cetuximab, supporting that, in a large population, this mutation is more likely to be induced by cetuximab than by panitumumab. There were, however, no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival between patients who were wild-type compared with those with the S492R mutation within the cetuximab arm or the overall population.Conclusions These results may support targeting treatment to small patient subgroups based on the presence of emerging EGFR mutations and provide a molecular rationale for rechallenging with a different anti-EGFR agent in patients who develop resistance. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab in the EGFR p.S492R mutant population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15384047.2020.1798695

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EGFR somatic sequence changes G465R, G465E, S468R and S492R at the extracellular domains confer resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab by preventing monoclonal antibody binding.

    “EGFR somatic sequence changes, including G465R, G465E, S468R and S492R, located at the extracellular domains (ECDs) of the EGFR-mAb interaction interface, confer resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab by preventing mAb binding [10, 67, 68].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, T., Ang, A., Boedigheimer, M., Kim, T. W., Li, J., Cascinu, S., Ruff, P., Satya Suresh, A., Thomas, A., Tjulandin, S., & Peeters, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Shanghai East Hospital (CN)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Price, Timothy
Venue
Cancer Biology & Therapy
Published
2020-10-02
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
891-898
ISSN
  • 1538-4047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-8576
OpenAlex
W3092636333
Cited by
33
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Biology & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
Amgen Inc (Not Applicable)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
epidermal growth factor receptor, metastatic colorectal cancer, panitumumab, cetuximab, anti-EGFR therapy resistance, plasma DNA, circulating tumor DNA, biomarkers, treatment rechallenge, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Female, Humans, Male, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review