Cited by 789Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Treatment and RAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Van Cutsem, Eric, Lenz, Heinz-Josef, Köhne, Claus-Henning, Heinemann, Volker, Tejpar, Sabine, Melezínek, Ivan, Beier, Frank, Stroh, Christopher +3 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The phase III CRYSTAL study demonstrated that addition of cetuximab to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS codon 12/13 (exon 2) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Outcome was reassessed in subgroups defined by extended RAS mutation testing. Patients and Methods: Existing DNA samples from KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors from CRYSTAL study patients were reanalyzed for other RAS mutations in four additional KRAS codons (exons 3 and 4) and six NRAS codons (exons 2, 3, and 4) using beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics technology. No tissue microdissection was performed. A ≥ 5% mutant allele cutoff was used to call mutations. Results: Mutation status was evaluable in 430 (64.6%) of 666 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors. Other RAS mutations were detected in 63 (14.7%) of 430 patients. In those with RAS wild-type tumors, a significant benefit across all efficacy end points was associated with the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI. In patients with other RAS tumor mutations, no difference in efficacy outcomes between treatment groups was seen. The safety profile in RAS subgroups was similar and in line with expectations. Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of mCRC, patients with RAS wild-type tumors derived a significant benefit from the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI; patients with RAS tumor mutations did not. Molecular testing of tumors for all activating RAS mutations is essential before considering anti–epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, thereby allowing the further tailoring of cetuximab administration to maximize patient benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.59.4812

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Cutsem, E., Lenz, H.-J., Köhne, C.-H., Heinemann, V., Tejpar, S., Melezínek, I., Beier, F., Stroh, C., Rougier, P., van Krieken, J. H., & Ciardiello, F.
Affiliations
  • Eric Van Cutsem and Sabine Tejpar, University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Heinz-Josef Lenz, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Claus-Henning Köhne, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg; Volker Heinemann, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich; Ivan Melezínek, Frank Beier, and Christopher Stroh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Philippe Rougier, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris,...
  • Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
692-700
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2112570485
Cited by
789
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 1
FWCI
44.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • Merck KGaA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
cetuximab, FOLFIRI, metastatic colorectal cancer, RAS mutations, KRAS exon 2 wild-type, NRAS mutation, anti-EGFR therapy, first-line therapy, CRYSTAL trial, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Leucovorin, Female, Fluorouracil, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Middle Aged, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, ras Proteins, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review