Cited by 49Traffic and Road SafetyOlder Adults Driving StudiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teenagers’ Licensing Decisions and Their Views of Licensing Policies: A National Survey

Williams, Allan F.·2011·Traffic Injury Prevention

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One objective was to determine teenage licensing rates on a national basis, interest in early licensure, and reasons for delay. A second objective was to learn teenagers' opinions about licensing policies, important in states considering ways to upgrade their current licensing systems. METHODS: One thousand three hundred eighty-three 15- to 18-year-olds completed an online survey in November 2010. They were drawn from a nationally representative panel of US households recruited using probability-based sampling. The panel included cell phone-only households, and Internet access was provided to those without it. Weighting procedures were applied so that the study population represented the national US population of 15- to 18-year-olds. RESULTS: Most teens said that they were interested in getting a license as soon as legally possible, but many had not started the process. At 16, teens were about equally divided among those who had not started, those in the learner stage, and those with a restricted or full license. At 18, 62 percent had full licenses; 22 percent had not started. For those old enough to start, lack of a car, costs, parent availability, ability to get around without a car, and being busy with other activities were leading reasons for delay. The majority of teens were not in favor of higher licensing ages. Forty-six percent thought the minimum learner age should be 16; 30 percent thought the full license age should be 18 or older. The majority approved of night (78%) and passenger (57%) restrictions, and 85 and 93 percent endorsed cell phone and texting bans, respectively. When these policies were packaged together in a single law that included an age 16 start, night, passenger, cell phone and texting bans, and a full license at age 18, 74 percent of teens were in favor. CONCLUSIONS: Teenagers are not as supportive of strong licensing policies as parents of teens, but there is evidence that they will support comprehensive policies likely to lead to further reductions in teen crash rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15389588.2011.572100

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Block A W, 2008, Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey: Driver Education and Graduated Licensing
  2. 2007, Driving: Through the Eyes of Teens
  3. Gregory T, 2010, The Chicago Tribune.
  4. 2006, Comment to the Federal Highway Administration Registration and Licensed Driver Information; Docket no. FHWA-05-22706
  5. Mayhew D R, 1998, J Traffic Med., 26, 37
  6. Neff J, 2010, Advertising Age.
  7. 1985, Teenage Driving Curfews: A Market Research Study to Determine Teenagers’ Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Driving Curfews in Four States
  8. Shults R A, 2010, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 59
  9. St. George D, 2010, The Washington Post

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Williams, A. F.
Corresponding author
Williams, Allan F.
Venue
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2011-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
312-319
ISSN
  • 1538-957X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9588
OpenAlex
W2157556256
Cited by
49
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Traffic Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Allstate Foundation
  • National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
teenage drivers, driver licensing policy, passenger restrictions, parental attitudes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Automobile Driving, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Licensure, Male, United States, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review