The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning: A Review of the Literature from 1990–2000
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on computer uses in second language and foreign language learning from 1990 to 2000 inclusive. Given the strong interest in technology use for language learning, it is important to look at how technology has been used in the field thus far. The goals of this research are twofold: (1) to understand how computers have been used in the past 11 years to support second and foreign language learning and (2) to explore any evidence regarding how computer technology can enhance acquisition of language skills. This article discusses the findings under the following categories: potentials of computer technology and its use in specific areas, software tools used in certain language skill areas, software design considerations, computerized language testing, and research findings from studies using quantitative and/or qualitative methodologies. Finally, issues important for future research are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Study of Second Language Acquisition
Brown, C., & Ellis, R. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329065 · Cited by 4,199
The Study of Second Language Acquisition
Kearney, J., & Ellis, R. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588082 · Cited by 3,146
Language learning and technology
Healey, D. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315657899.ch1 · Cited by 1,419
Computer‐Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice
WARSCHAUER, M. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x · Cited by 1,042
Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner
Gass, S. M., & Gass, S. M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203053560 · Cited by 1,016
Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom
Warschauer, M. (1995) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26 · Cited by 955
KERN, R. G. (1995) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x · Cited by 866
Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition
CHUN, D. M., & PLASS, J. L. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x · Cited by 759
Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence
Chun, D. M. (1994) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(94)90037-x · Cited by 676
Reynolds, C. R. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0485 · Cited by 617
Cited by
Kaleimamoowahinekapu Galla, C. (2018) · Language and Literacy · doi:10.20360/langandlit29412 · Cited by 39
Eye movements of online Chinese learners
Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2015) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/calico.v32i1.25964 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research on Technology in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-273
- ISSN
- 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0818
- OpenAlex
- W1630033293
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning: A Review of the Literature from 1990–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
- The paper
- Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning: A Review of the Literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.