The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review
Abstract
Various technologies are now available to design engineers to condition raw natural gas to pipeline quality. Conditioning of natural gas involves the removal of acid gases like CO2 and H2S, besides water vapor. Among different separation methods available, membrane technology has emerged to be a viable and valuable option over conventional techniques like amine absorption, in view of its advantages such as economy, process safety and environmentally benign nature. Semi‐permeable membranes were first employed in natural gas processing for more than 20 years. However, the technological breakthrough in the application of polymeric membranes to natural gas separation accelerated with the development of asymmetric membranes, which retain their selective characteristics, but after increased permeation rates as compared to their dense counterparts. Efforts to correlate the basic polymer structure with permeability and selectivity have resulted in the synthesis of novel polymers. Membranes for natural gas separation are most generally configured in the form of hollow fibers, capillaries or spirally wound elements, considering their intrinsic separation characteristics, process conditions and design parameters. This review addresses the current scientific and technological breakthrough that governs the field of application of membranes for natural gas separation. The performance of such membranes and the current research activity on CO2/CH4 separation are the main focus of this review. Potential membrane materials for further research in this area are also discussed
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Physical Polymer Science
Sperling, L. H. (2005) · doi:10.1002/0471757128 · Cited by 2,917
Gas permeation properties of poly(lactic acid)
Lehermeier, H. J., Dorgan, J. R., & Way, J. D. (2001) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00446-x · Cited by 191
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources
Choi, S., Drese, J. H., & Jones, C. W. (2009) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.200900036 · Cited by 2,596
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
Current status and development of membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: A review
Zhang, Y., Sunarso, J., Liu, S., & Wang, R. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.009 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- Sridhar, S., Smitha, B., & Aminabhavi, T. M.
- Venue
- Separation & Purification Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-174
- ISSN
- 1542-2119 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2127
- OpenAlex
- W2033447591
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15422110601165967
- The paper
- Sridhar, S., Smitha, B., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2007). Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review. Separation & Purification Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110601165967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.