Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review

Sridhar, S., Smitha, B., Aminabhavi, T. M.·2007·Separation & Purification Reviews

Abstract

Various technologies are now available to design engineers to condition raw natural gas to pipeline quality. Conditioning of natural gas involves the removal of acid gases like CO2 and H2S, besides water vapor. Among different separation methods available, membrane technology has emerged to be a viable and valuable option over conventional techniques like amine absorption, in view of its advantages such as economy, process safety and environmentally benign nature. Semi‐permeable membranes were first employed in natural gas processing for more than 20 years. However, the technological breakthrough in the application of polymeric membranes to natural gas separation accelerated with the development of asymmetric membranes, which retain their selective characteristics, but after increased permeation rates as compared to their dense counterparts. Efforts to correlate the basic polymer structure with permeability and selectivity have resulted in the synthesis of novel polymers. Membranes for natural gas separation are most generally configured in the form of hollow fibers, capillaries or spirally wound elements, considering their intrinsic separation characteristics, process conditions and design parameters. This review addresses the current scientific and technological breakthrough that governs the field of application of membranes for natural gas separation. The performance of such membranes and the current research activity on CO2/CH4 separation are the main focus of this review. Potential membrane materials for further research in this area are also discussed

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15422110601165967

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Sridhar, S., Smitha, B., & Aminabhavi, T. M.
Venue
Separation & Purification Reviews
Published
2007-05
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
113-174
ISSN
  • 1542-2119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2127
OpenAlex
W2033447591
Cited by
309
References
2
FWCI
19.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15422110601165967
The paper
Sridhar, S., Smitha, B., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2007). Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Mixtures through Polymeric Membranes—A Review. Separation & Purification Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110601165967

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.