The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mediation Models for Longitudinal Data in Developmental Research
Abstract
Mediation models are used to describe the mechanism(s) by which one variable influences another. These models can be useful in developmental research to explicate the relationship between variables, developmental processes, or combinations of variables and processes. In this article we describe aspects of mediation effects specific to developmental research. We focus on three central issues in longitudinal mediation models: the theory of change for variables in the model, the role of time in the model, and the types of indirect effects in the model. We use these themes as we describe three different models for examining mediation in longitudinal data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This type of analysis is recommended for repeated measurements and multiple mediators, because they allow for a more dynamic approach to mediation, by assessing changes in multiple variables and their interrelations over time [103–105].”
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Self-citation(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,071
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605
Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23 · Cited by 3,401 · cited 2×
“Cole and Maxwell (2003; Maxwell & Cole, 2007) elaborate on the pitfalls of using cross-sectional data to model mediation, showing that severe bias is probable in this situation.”
BackgroundBollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2005) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/0471746096 · Cited by 1,824
Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development
Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1979) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 1,004
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J. M. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402004 · Cited by 933
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Achenbach T. M., 1992, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist / 2–3 and 1992 Profile
- Grimm K. J., 2009, Research in Human Development, 6, 144
- McArdle J. J., 2001, Structural equation modeling: Present and future, 342
- McArdle J. J., 1994, Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions, 223
- Muthén L. K., 2007, Mplus user's guide
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An index and test of linear moderated mediation
Hayes, A. F. (2015) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 · Cited by 3,979
Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models
Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617715068 · Cited by 1,837
Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.606716 · Cited by 1,471
Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation
Carter, A. R., Sanderson, E., Hammerton, G., Richmond, R. C., Davey Smith, G., Heron, J., Taylor, A. E., Davies, N. M., & Howe, L. D. (2021) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1 · Cited by 1,215
Sloan, E., Hall, K., Moulding, R., Bryce, S., Mildred, H., & Staiger, P. K. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.002 · Cited by 1,052
Metadata
- Authors
- Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Selig, James P.
- Venue
- Research in Human Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 144-164
- ISSN
- 1542-7609 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-7617
- OpenAlex
- W2112284812
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Human Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- mediation model, longitudinal data, developmental research, theory of change, indirect effects, developmental processes, mediation analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
