Cited by 9Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Is stronger better? Influence of a strength phase followed by a hypertrophy phase on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained men

Open access
Carvalho, Leonardo, Junior, Roberto Moriggi, Truffi, Gabriel, Serra, Adriano, Sander, Rafaela, De Souza, Eduardo O., Barroso, Renato·2021·Research in Sports Medicine

Abstract

Although used by resistance-trained individuals, it is unknown if increasing muscle strength prior to hypertrophy training leads to greater muscle growth and strength gains. We investigated muscle thickness and maximum strength in 26 resistance-trained men who were randomly assigned to either: STHT, consisted in a 3-week strength-oriented training period (4x1-3 repetition maximum [RM]) prior to a 5-week hypertrophy-oriented period (4x8-12RM), or HT, which comprised an 8-week hypertrophy-oriented training period. Vastus lateralis muscle thickness, and back squat and leg-press 1-RM were assessed at pre, third week, and after 8 weeks of training. When pre-to-post changes are compared, STHT induced greater muscle growth (p = 0.049; 95%CI = 0.15-3.2%; d = 0.81) and strength gains in the back squat (p = 0.015; 95%CI = 1.5-13%; d = 1.05) and leg-press 45° (p = 0.044; 95%CI = 0.16-9.9%; d = 0.79) compared to HT. Our results support the use of a period to increase muscle strength prior to an HT to increase muscle thickness and maximum strength in resistance-trained men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15438627.2020.1853546

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, L., Junior, R. M., Truffi, G., Serra, A., Sander, R., De Souza, E. O., & Barroso, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Department of Sport Sciences, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
  • Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
Corresponding author
Carvalho, Leonardo
Venue
Research in Sports Medicine
Published
2020-11-26
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
536-546
ISSN
  • 1543-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8635
OpenAlex
W3106816079
Cited by
9
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Research in Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-FAPESP (2014/20369-1)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES (2018/23-p4748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, muscle thickness, muscle strength gain, resistance-trained men, vastus lateralis, back squat, leg press, training volume
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Time Factors, Weight Lifting, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review