The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Head-and-Face Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Respirator Users
Abstract
Sizing data generated by the military for use in fitting respirators have been the normative basis for commercial respirator sizing. Anthropometric data developed for males and females of military age in the 1950s and 1960s are still in use today and form the only comprehensive body of information available on this subject. The twofold objective of this study was to: (1) develop an anthropometric database detailing the face size distributions of respirator users using both traditional measurement methods and three-dimensional scanning systems; and (2) use the database to establish fit test panels to be incorporated into the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's respirator certification and international standards. A stratified sampling plan was used with three age strata, two gender strata, and four race/ethnic group strata. The plan called for an equal sample size of 166 in each cell. Subjects were obtained at 41 sites from 8 states. In addition to height and weight, 18 facial dimensions and neck circumferences were measured using traditional methods. A total of 3997 subjects were measured using traditional methods, and 1013 of them were also scanned using a 3-D head scanner. As this was a volunteer sample, subjects did not appear in the specific proportions needed for the sampling plan. The resulting data were weighted to correspond to the U.S. population. This article presents the summary statistics for the traditional measurement data only. Multivariate analyses of the data from this study and military data revealed that using historical, military data would be inadequate for describing the anthropometric variability of the current U.S. work force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Generalized procrustes analysis
Gower, J. C. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291478 · Cited by 3,267
Cited by
Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation
Kim, Y., Genevriere, E., Harker, P., Choe, J., Balicki, M., Regenhardt, R. W., Vranic, J. E., Dmytriw, A. A., Patel, A. B., & Zhao, X. (2022) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abg9907 · Cited by 422
Evaluating the Efficacy of Cloth Facemasks in Reducing Particulate Matter Exposure
Shakya, K. M., Noyes, A., Kallin, R., & Peltier, R. E. (2017) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/jes.2016.42 · Cited by 202
New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force
Zhuang, Z., Bradtmiller, B., & Shaffer, R. E. (2007) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620701497538 · Cited by 187
Self-citationLearning Race from Face: A Survey
Fu, S., He, H., & Hou, Z.-G. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2321570 · Cited by 178
The Effect of Subject Characteristics and Respirator Features on Respirator Fit
Zhuang, Z., Coffey, C. C., & Ann, R. B. (2005) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620500391668 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuang, Z., & Bradtmiller, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 567-576
- ISSN
- 1545-9624 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9632
- OpenAlex
- W2146064221
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Head-and-Face Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Respirator Users. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15459620500324727
- The paper
- Zhuang, Z., & Bradtmiller, B. (2005). Head-and-Face Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Respirator Users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620500324727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.