Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The RNA degradome: a precious resource for deciphering RNA processing and regulation codes in plants

Ma, Xiaoxia, Yin, Xiaopu, Tang, Zhonghai, Ito, Hidetaka, Shao, Chaogang, Meng, Yijun, Xie, Tian·2020·RNA Biology

Abstract

The plant RNA degradome was defined as an aggregate of the RNA fragments degraded from various biochemical pathways, such as RNA turnover, maturation and quality surveillance. In recent years, the degradome sequencing (degradome-seq) libraries became a rich storehouse for researchers to study on RNA processing and regulation. Here, we provided a brief overview of the uses of degradome-seq data in plant RNA biology, especially on non-coding RNA processing and small RNA-guided target cleavages. Some novel applications in RNA research area, such as in vivo mapping of the endoribonucleolytic cleavage sites, identification of conserved motifs at the 5ʹ ends of the uncapped RNA fragments, and searching for the protein-binding regions on the transcripts, were also mentioned. More importantly, we proposed a model for the biologists to deduce the contributions of transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional regulation to gene differential expression based on degradome-seq data. Finally, we hope that the degradome-based analytical methods could be widely applied for the studies on RNA biology in eukaryotes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15476286.2020.1757898

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Thody J, 2018, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, 8730
  2. Yu D, 2018, Brief Bioinform, 19, 1317

Cited by

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Ma, X., Yin, X., Tang, Z., Ito, H., Shao, C., Meng, Y., & Xie, T.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Normal University , Hangzhou, China
  • College of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University , Changsha, Hunan, PR China
  • Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Japan
  • College of Life Sciences, Huzhou University , Huzhou, PR China
Venue
RNA Biology
Published
2020-04-26
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1223-1227
ISSN
  • 1547-6286
  • 1555-8584
Cited by
17
References
46
Language
en
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730108, 31970637, 81973635)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The RNA degradome: a precious resource for deciphering RNA processing and regulation codes in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15476286.2020.1757898
The paper
Ma, X., Yin, X., Tang, Z., Ito, H., Shao, C., Meng, Y., & Xie, T. (2020). The RNA degradome: a precious resource for deciphering RNA processing and regulation codes in plants. RNA Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2020.1757898

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.