Cited by 7RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA Research and SplicingMicroRNA in disease regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

C-terminal tagging impairs AGO2 function

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A full understanding of RNA silencing requires appropriate molecular biology tools to explore the roles of Argonaute 2 (AGO2) and the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Approaches relying on affinity tagging and antibodies have important limitations that can lead to artificial results. Both the N- and C-terminal domains of AGO2 have been shown to be important for correct activity and yet the consequences of appending tags to either terminus have not been fully investigated. N-terminal tags are frequently used to study AGO2 biology. Recently, an N-terminal HaloTag-Ago2 fusion was reported and examined in mice. While the versatile HaloTag provided new opportunities to study RISC biology, the tagged construct showed certain activity changes compared to unmodified AGO2. CRISPaint, a new CRISPR-Cas9 technique, permits the creation of endogenous C-terminal tag fusions. We used CRISPaint to generate the first reported recombinant AGO2 construct with a C-terminal tag: an endogenous C-terminal HaloTag fusion to AGO2 (AGO2HALO) in human (A549) cells. We found that the AGO2HALO fusion protein has a reduced capacity to interact with the key protein binding partner TNRC6A and that the C-terminal HaloTag does not affect cell viability. However, the AGO2HALO fusion significantly impairs RNA cleavage and RNA silencing activity compared to control cells and reduces nuclear localisation of the fusion protein. Using plasmid constructs and transient transfection, we compared AGO2 tagged with EGFP at the N- or C- terminus in siRNA and miRNA reporter gene assays, and cellular localisation. N-terminally tagged AGO2 functioned and localised similarly to WT untagged AGO2, whereas, C-terminally tagged AGO2 was impaired in siRNA and miRNA silencing and exhibited poor nuclear and P-body localisation. We conclude that the fusion of a C-terminal HaloTag to AGO2 is not appropriate for studying AGO2 and RISC. Our results assert the importance of comprehensively validating recombinant tagging strategies to ensure that any experimental results generated do not arise from, or are not obscured by critical functional defects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15476286.2025.2534028

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1101/2023.11.20.567203 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrm2321 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/wrna.1701 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nrg2936 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1101/gad.1424106 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nsmb.2166 · DOI
  7. 10.1261/rna.1229409 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/ncb1333 · DOI
  9. 10.1261/rna.056499.116 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)31005-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nmeth.2534 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acsomega.7b01598 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1424217112 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.009 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.015 · DOI
  16. Gurard-Levin ZA, Kilian KA, Kim J, et al. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem Biol. 2010;60:45–58.
  17. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00191 · DOI
  18. 10.32604/biocell.2022.018197 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.04.003 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.026 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s43586-021-00018-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nmeth.3256 · DOI
  23. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2526 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jacs.2c11969 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nsmb.2232 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature02519 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.040 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1103946108 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nature03462 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1102514 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600488 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nature03514 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nsmb918 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00036-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.011 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature11211 · DOI
  37. 10.5761/atcs.ra.21-00040 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00360 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nsmb.2577 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nsmb.2607 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M112.441030 · DOI
  42. 10.1124/jpet.122.001085 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ng.905 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/ncomms12338 · DOI
  45. 10.1089/nat.2019.0815 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkg601 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gkw010 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Johnson KC Johnson ST Liu J et al. Prioritizing annotated miRnas: only a small percentage are candidates for biological regulation. 2022. · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nature03868 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nature09092 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1126/science.1190809 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.1006432107 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.020 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41467-021-27423-0 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/embor.2010.44 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.047 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0165-4608(00)00329-0 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s13277-014-2462-3 · DOI
  61. 10.1126/science.1221551 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.051 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400070 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl318 · DOI
  65. Sallis S Grondin B Leduc E et al. FAM172A controls the nuclear import and alternative splicing function of AGO2. bioRxiv. 2022. · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkv705 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.023 · DOI
  68. 10.26508/lsa.202302133 · DOI
  69. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00402 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1261/rna.034769.112 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.075 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Johnson KC Kilikevicius A Hofman C et al. Nuclear localization of argonaute is affected by cell density and May relieve repression by microRNAs. 2023. · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.020 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/ncb1274 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1038/s41598-017-07539-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Shah, K. M., Crozier, A. F. F., Assaraf, A., Arya, M., Grevitt, P., Mardakheh, F., Plevin, M. J., & Sharp, T. V.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Tyson V.
Venue
RNA Biology
Published
2025-07-23
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-24
ISSN
  • 1547-6286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-8584
OpenAlex
W4412593720
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
BBSRC (BB/V009567/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
Keywords
Argonaute 2, C-terminal tagging, RNA-induced silencing complex, microRNA silencing, siRNA knockdown, TNRC6A, nuclear import, RNA cleavage, CRISPR/Cas9 tagging, post-transcriptional regulation, A549 cells
MeSH terms
A549 Cells, Animals, Autoantigens, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Protein Binding, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, RNA-Binding Proteins, RNA Interference, MicroRNAs, Argonaute Proteins, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review