The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Through Discussions: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Settings
Abstract
The literature on teaching and learning heralds the benefits of discussion for student learner outcomes, especially its ability to improve students' critical thinking skills. Yet, few studies compare the effects of different types of face-to-face discussions on learners. Using student surveys, we analyze the benefits of small-group and large-class discussions in an upper-level political theory course. We also analyze whether the same types of students are likely to participate and reap the benefits of both types of discussions. We find that, overall, participation is higher in small-group discussions, as are students' perceptions of learner outcomes. We also find a more equal participation of students of different ethnic backgrounds in small-group discussions; similarly, previous academic achievements have less influence on discussion participation in small groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The research literature suggests that collaborative or co-operative training strategies (i.e.working together in small groups towards a common goal) and active learning techniques such as discussion are more effective than traditional, lecture-style training for acquiring new knowledge, building skills and increasing motivation to continue to improve skills.91”
Citations
Cites
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 1×
“Research highlights the advantages of other, more student-centered, active learning instruction, including discussions, for reaching these goals (see, eg, Prince 2004 ).”
BackgroundRethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology
Laurillard, D. (1993) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 2,381
Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Cohen, E. G. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 · Cited by 2,120
Laurillard, D. (2002) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203304846 · Cited by 828
BLIGH, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098268508708932 · Cited by 818
Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms
Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. L. (1999) · Cited by 731
FACE-TO-FACE VERSUS THREADED DISCUSSIONS: THE ROLE OF TIME AND HIGHER-ORDER THINKING
Meyer, K. A. (2003) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i3.1845 · Cited by 632
Laurillard, D. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · Cited by 593
McCarthy, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2000) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1023/b:ihie.0000047415.48495.05 · Cited by 388
Nicol, D., & Boyle, J. T. (2003) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0307507032000122297 · Cited by 359
Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: theory, practice, and assessment
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6039 · Cited by 254
The Impact of Group Size and Social Presence on Small-Group Communication
Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T., Romano, N., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406294322 · Cited by 252
Garside, C. (1996) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529609379050 · Cited by 244
Discussion as a way of teaching
Brookfield, S. (1999) · Cited by 243
Group Discussion as Interactive Dialogue or as Serial Monologue: The Influence of Group Size
Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Carletta, J. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00292 · Cited by 199
Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences
Caspi, A., Chajut, E., & Saporta, K. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.003 · Cited by 191
Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face-to-face discussions
Tiene, D. (2000) · Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia · Cited by 148
Phillips, R. (2005) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.2.1.2 · Cited by 137
Almond, G. A. (1991) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.2307/420091 · Cited by 133
Does Technology Enhance Actual Student Learning? The Case of Online Discussion Boards
Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.3200/joeb.80.6.316-321 · Cited by 129
Using Discussion Pedagogy to Enhance Oral and Written Communication Skills
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.56.3.163-172 · Cited by 90
Ellis, R. A., Calvo, R. A., Levy, D., & Tan, K. H. K. (2004) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/0729436032000168504 · Cited by 86
Wilson, B. M., Pollock, P. H., & Hamann, K. (2007) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160701338304 · Cited by 86
Self-citationTurning Teaching Into Learning: The Role of Student Responsibility in the Collegiate Experience
Davis, T. M. (1993) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 79
Burgan, M. A. (2006) · Change The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.3200/chng.38.6.30-34 · Cited by 64
Learning from “Listening” to Peers in Online Political Science Classes
Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2009) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160802612011 · Cited by 53
Self-citationGetting Active in the Large Lecture
Huerta, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160701558224 · Cited by 51
Adding an “Active Learning” Component to a Large Lecture Course
Buckley, G. L., Bain, N. R., Luginbuhl, A. M., & Dyer, M. L. (2004) · Journal of Geography · doi:10.1080/00221340408978607 · Cited by 38
Active and Accountable: Teaching Comparative Politics Using Cooperative Team Learning
Occhipinti, J. D. (2003) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096503001719 · Cited by 37
Wilen, W. W. (1990) · Cited by 32
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H. (1993) · Cited by 31
Fostering Scholarly Discussion and Critical Thinking in the Political Science Classroom
Marks, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160801998080 · Cited by 29
Botsch, C. S., & Botsch, R. E. (2001) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s104909650100021x · Cited by 29
William Fawcett Hill's Learning Through Discussion
Rabow, J., & Hill, W. F. (2000) · Cited by 28
Teaching and Learning Online: Assessing the Effect of Gender Context on Active Learning
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2005) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160490921815 · Cited by 26
Self-citationOnline Discussions Across Three Universities: Student Participation and Pedagogy
Clawson, R. A., Deen, R. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (2002) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096502001233 · Cited by 26
Mayo, A., Sharma, M. D., & Muller, D. A. (2008) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9090-0 · Cited by 24
Using Small-Group Discussions in Science Lectures: A Study of Two Professors
Windschitl, M. (1999) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567559909596075 · Cited by 21
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
(2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1 · Cited by 19
Wilson, B. M., Pollock, P. H., & Hamann, K. (2006) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096506060549 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bender Tisha., 2003, Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student-Learning
- Hamann , Kerstin , Philip H. Pollock , and Bruce M. Wilson . 2010 . “Teaching Theory through Discussion: Evaluating the Benefits of Discussion in Small-Group, Large-Class, and Online Environments.” Paper presented at the APSA Teaching and Learning Conference , Philadelphia , PA .
- Meyer Katrina A., 2003, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 55
- Tiene Drew., 2000, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 371
- Wilen William M., 1990, Teaching and Learning Through Discussion: The Theory, Research and Practice of the Discussion Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., Wood, C. E., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J. J., & Hardeman, W. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19990 · Cited by 680
Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative
Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003 · Cited by 456
Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2012) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.633407 · Cited by 138
Self-citationTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Spring, B. J., Pfammatter, A. F., Hoffman, S. A., & Warnick, J. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_221-2 · Cited by 134
Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils
Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N. (2024) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2221 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hamann, Kerstin
- Venue
- Journal of Political Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-64
- ISSN
- 1551-2169 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2177
- OpenAlex
- W1983864715
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 32.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Political Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- classroom discussion, small group discussion, student participation, critical thinking, political theory courses, ethnicity, prior academic achievement, student perceptions of learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
