Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tumor heterogeneity in autophagy-dependent ferroptosis

Open access
Li, Jingbo, Liu, Jiao, Xu, Yinghua, Wu, Runliu, Chen, Xin, Song, Xinxin, Zeh, Herbert, Kang, Rui, Klionsky, Daniel J., Wang, Xiaoyan, Tang, Daolin·2021·Autophagy

Abstract

Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as “autophagy”) is a lysosome-mediated degradation process that plays a complex role in cellular stress, either promoting survival or triggering death. Early studies suggest that ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death, is not related to autophagy. Conversely, recent evidence indicates that the molecular machinery of autophagy facilitates ferroptosis through the selective degradation of anti-ferroptosis regulators. However, the mechanism of autophagy-dependent ferroptosis remains incompletely understood. Here, we examine the early dynamic change in protein expression of autophagic (e.g., MAP1LC3B and SQSTM1) or ferroptotic (e.g., SLC7A11 and GPX4) regulators in 60 human cancer cell lines in response to two classical ferroptosis activators (erastin and RSL3) in the absence or presence of the lysosomal inhibitor chloroquine. Compared to erastin, RSL3 exhibits wider and stronger activity in the upregulation of MAP1LC3B-II or downregulation of SQSTM1 in 80% (48/60) or 63% (38/60) of cell lines, respectively. Both RSL3 and erastin failed to affect SLC7A11 expression, but they led to GPX4 downregulation in 12% (7/60) and 3% (2/60) of cell lines, respectively. Additionally, the intracellular iron exporter SLC40A1/ferroportin-1 was identified as a new substrate for autophagic elimination, and its degradation by SQSTM1 promoted ferroptosis in vitro and in xenograft tumor mouse models. Together, these findings show tumor heterogeneity in autophagy-dependent ferroptosis, which might have different biological behaviors with regard to the dynamic characteristics of cell death.Abbreviations: ATG: Autophagy-related; CQ: Chloroquine; GPX4: Glutathione peroxidase 4; MAP1LC3B/LC3: Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta: NCOA4: Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 4; ROS: Reactive Oxygen Species; SLC40A1/ferroportin-1: Solute Carrier family 40 Member 1; SLC7A11: Solute Carrier Family 7 Member 11; SQSTM1/p62: Sequestosome 1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2021.1872241

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Wu, R., Chen, X., Song, X., Zeh, H., Kang, R., Klionsky, D. J., Wang, X., & Tang, D.
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2021-01-15
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
3361-3374
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W3120149874
Cited by
245
References
23
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor heterogeneity in autophagy-dependent ferroptosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15548627.2021.1872241
The paper
Li, J., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Wu, R., Chen, X., Song, X., Zeh, H., Kang, R., Klionsky, D. J., Wang, X., & Tang, D. (2021). Tumor heterogeneity in autophagy-dependent ferroptosis. Autophagy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2021.1872241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.