Cited by 39Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

“If U Don’t Pay they will Share the Pics”: Exploring Sextortion in the Context of Romance Fraud

Cross, Cassandra, Holt, Karen, O’Malley, Roberta Liggett·2023·Victims & Offenders

Abstract

Romance fraud involves the guise of a perceived genuine relationship to gain a financial reward. While those who commit these crimes employ a variety of techniques, emerging evidence suggests the use of sextortion to financially gain from victims. To date, sextortion has been explored generally in the image-based sexual abuse and sexual violence literature but not in the context of romance fraud. This article explores reports of 258 individuals who made a complaint to Scamwatch (Australian online fraud reporting portal) about romance fraud, captured between July 2018 and July 2019 (inclusive). Each of these complaints directly references the use of sextortion, through a threat to expose an intimate image or recording in response to a monetary request. Using an established cyber sextortion typology, this article applies these categories in the context of romance fraud to determine if there is consistency in the use of this technique, or whether its use in the context of romance fraud is unique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15564886.2022.2075064

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a minority of cases involved perpetrators obtaining images without the victim's awareness, such as through webcam access.

    “Only a minority of cases involved perpetrators obtaining images without the victim’s awareness, such as through webcam access (Cross et al., 2022; Mandau, 2021).”

    From Sextortion: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Cross et al., 2022

  • Sextortion is perpetrated by a diverse group of offenders, both known and unknown to the victim.

    “Sextortion can occur in a variety of contexts and is perpetrated by a diverse group of offenders, both known and unknown to the victim.”

    From Sextortion: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Cross et al., 2022

  • Several studies, including Cross et al. (2022), observed that the use of intimate images tended to function as a tool of escalation, especially when the victim refused to pay the money.

    “Several studies, including Cross et al. (2022), observed that the use of intimate images tended to function as a tool of escalation, especially when the victim refused to pay the money.”

    From Sextortion: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Cross et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cross, C., Holt, K., & O’Malley, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Cross, Cassandra
Venue
Victims & Offenders
Published
2022-05-19
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
1194-1215
ISSN
  • 1556-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4991
OpenAlex
W4280643393
Cited by
39
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Victims & Offenders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
sextortion, romance fraud, online dating fraud, image-based sexual abuse, economic violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review