Cited by 28Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryContact Dermatitis and AllergiesAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Effects of anatomical location on in vivo percutaneous penetration in man

Bormann, Jordan L., Maibach, Howard I.·2020·Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Abstract

Purpose Percutaneous penetration in man is affected by several factors: chemical properties, skin anatomy variables, and environmental conditions can all modify the quantity of chemical that penetrates through the skin barrier. The amount of chemical or drug that penetrates the cutaneous barrier must be considered due to the local and systemic absorption that may occur. Regional variation in percutaneous absorption is an additional factor to recognize when analysing chemical percutaneous penetration. Although it has been studied that certain anatomic sites allow for increased absorption, there is limited literature regarding in vivo data in man. This overview catalogues and analyses studies performed in man to quantify chemical permeation at varying anatomical locations. We also review what is known about the pharmacokinetics of Food and Drug Administration approved medication patches and semisolids and the regional variation in absorption that they may display. This research work aims to create an updated, concise overview of the pertinent studies available regarding percutaneous penetration and regional variability. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the United States Food and Drug Administration's online database for approved transdermal delivery systems from January 1965 to March 2020, with the search words: percutaneous absorption, regional variation, anatomical location, along with extensive bibliographical review. We further ut…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15569527.2020.1787434

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, dosed substances are absorbed more readily around the face, which is considered to have thinner skin than the trunk and limbs, suggesting that absorption depends on skin thickness.

    “In humans, dosed substances are absorbed more readily around the face, which is considered to have thinner skin than that around the trunk and limbs, suggesting that it depends on the thickness of the skin50, 51.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bormann, J. L., & Maibach, H. I.
Affiliations
  • University of South Dakota (US)
  • Dermatology Department, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Bormann, Jordan L.
Venue
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Published
2020-07-02
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
213-222
ISSN
  • 1556-9527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-9535
OpenAlex
W3041609207
Cited by
28
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
percutaneous absorption, anatomical location, transdermal drug delivery, transdermal patch, pharmacokinetics, skin barrier
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Skin, Skin Absorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review