The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea
Open accessAbstract
Botryosphaeria dothidea is one of the most commonly reported species in a genus of important pathogens of woody plants. This taxon generally is accepted to represent a species complex, and hence its identity remains unclear. Previous studies either have treated B. dothidea as the valid name for B. ribis and B. berengeriana or argued for them to be separate entities. To add to the confusion, no ex-type cultures are available for either B. dothidea or B. ribis. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to recollect and characterize these fungi and designate a set of reference cultures that can be used in future studies. To this end, morphological, cultural and multi-allelic DNA sequence datasets from the rDNA (ITS 1, 5.8S, and ITS 2), β-tubulin and EF1-α genes were used to fully characterize these species. Botryosphaeria dothidea was found to be distinct from B. ribis, while B. berengeriana was retained as synonym of the former name. Furthermore, Fusicoccum aesculi is accepted as anamorph of B. dothidea, while the anamorph of B. ribis is newly described as F. ribis sp. nov. Botryosphaeria ribis could be distinguished from B. parva based on β-tubulin and EF1-α sequence data. A combined phylogeny of the three gene regions used in this study also showed that the genus Botryosphaeria represents two distinct phylogenetic assemblages that correspond to species with Diplodia and Fusicoccum anamorphs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Glass, N. L., & Donaldson, G. C. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 · Cited by 4,755
A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes
Carbone, I., & Kohn, L. M. (1999) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051 · Cited by 4,217
TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE
Farris, J. S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A. G., & Bult, C. (1994) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.x · Cited by 3,833
O'Donnell, K., & Cigelnik, E. (1997) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 · Cited by 2,397
Phylogenetic Species Recognition and Species Concepts in Fungi
Taylor, J. W., Jacobson, D. J., Kroken, S., Kasuga, T., Geiser, D. M., Hibbett, D. S., & Fisher, M. C. (2000) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228 · Cited by 1,902
Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi
Raeder, U., & Broda, P. (1985) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.1985.tb01479.x · Cited by 1,704
Rayner, R. W. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,342
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Grapevine trunk diseases: complex and still poorly understood
Bertsch, C., Ramírez‐Suero, M., Magnin‐Robert, M., Larignon, P., Chong, J., Abou‐Mansour, E., Spagnolo, A., Clément, C., & Fontaine, F. (2013) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02674.x · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Slippers, B., Crous, P. W., Denman, S., Coutinho, T. A., Wingfield, B. D., & Wingfield, M. J.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-101
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-2536
- OpenAlex
- W2150700313
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15572536.2005.11833000
- The paper
- Slippers, B., Crous, P. W., Denman, S., Coutinho, T. A., Wingfield, B. D., & Wingfield, M. J. (2004). Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2005.11833000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.