Cited by 1Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential DNA methylation clock ages across buffy coat (BC), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and saliva in individuals in early-to-mid adulthood

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Epigenetic aging prior to midlife is gaining interest as an intervenable period to address health and cognitive aging. Epigenetic changes may index DNA methylation aging rates, but methylation profiles may not be substitutable across tissues. We compared DNA methylation clocks and age acceleration in saliva, buffy coat (BC), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected in 91 individuals (7 unpaired, 20 siblings, 64 twins; 18 monozygotic (MZ), 14 dizygotic (DZ) pairs) from the Colorado Adoption/Twin Study of Lifespan behavioral development and cognitive aging (CATSLife1; Mean age=30.90 years [range=28.07–41.13]; 50.5% female). Across 15 DNA methylation clocks, chronological age and DNA methylation ages were moderately associated (mean Spearman correlations: r =0.37, Saliva; r =0.41, BC; r =0.38, PBMC). In mixed-effects models, saliva showed higher DNA methylation ages ( B =3.83–16.46 years vs BC, p<0.001), whereas PBMC and BC were comparable ( B =-0.06–0.39 years vs BC, p > 0.447). The exception was the next-generation clock DunedinPace showing comparability ( p =0.486). Similar patterns were observed for age acceleration estimates. Altogether, MZ pairs (meta-analytic r= 0.49, 95%CI=0.32,0.66) and DZ pairs (meta-analytic r= 0.38, 95%CI=0.25,0.52) were moderately correlated (Spearman), but MZ pairs showed heterogeneity across tissues ( p <0.020): saliva was lower (mean r= 0.33, SD =0.25) than BC (mean r= 0.64, SD =0.10) and PBMC (mean r= 0.49, SD =0.18). Next-generation PCGrimAge and DunedinPace clocks showed consistent zygosity correlations across tissues, while multi-tissue clocks (e.g., ZhangQ) showed comparable MZ-DZ correlations. While saliva-based DNA methylation is not a direct substitute for blood-based DNA methylation, BC and PBMC show comparability; nevertheless, all tissue types may be appropriate for DNA methylation aging studies when compared within tissues. Key Policy Highlights Saliva-based methylation is not a direct substitute for blood-based methylation. Saliva-based DNA methylation clocks demonstrated relatively older methylation ages and faster age accelerations relative to blood-based DNA methylation clocks. Blood-based DNA methylation clocks were comparable across buffy coat and peripheral blood mononuclear cell tissues. Twin similarity, particularly among identical twins, was higher for blood-based DNA methylation clocks and newer generation DNA methylation clocks. Three clocks (one first-generation multi-tissue and two next-generation) showed consistency and/or comparability across tissues and showed moderate to strong correlations among identical and fraternal twins, supporting the importance of tool development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15592294.2026.2653960

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1182/blood.V93.12.4059 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.010 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.08.006 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/acel.12349 · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fgene.2023.1125967 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrg1655 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1186/s13072-018-0191-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/bcpt.12721 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/15592294.2017.1417710 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.782843 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/epigenomes1030014 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41576-024-00807-w · DOI
  13. 10.3390/cancers14194882 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3669 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ajmg.b.32278 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/s41598-018-25311-0 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/ijms252011329 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/s12865-019-0286-z · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s43856-024-00652-2 · DOI
  20. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0859 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000533 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11357-014-9648-x · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044213 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41467-023-40389-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11357-023-00871-w · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10522-025-10265-4 · DOI
  27. 10.7554/eLife.51507 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/s42003-025-08021-y · DOI
  29. 10.1186/s13148-025-01868-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/acel.14451 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/amp0000600 · DOI
  32. 10.7554/eLife.73420 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.18632/aging.101684 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.040 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/acel.13197 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/thg.2019.49 · DOI
  37. 10.1023/B:BEGE.0000038492.50446.25 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw691 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/15592294.2021.1890874 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/s12864-021-07675-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/brain/awaa334 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1038/s43587-022-00248-2 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.18632/aging.101414 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1037/met0000079 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Knopik VS, Neiderhiser JM, DeFries JC, et al. Behavioral genetics. 7th ed. New York (NY): Worth Publishers; 2017.
  49. Hagenbeek FA, van Dongen J, Pool R, et al. Twins and omics: the role of twin studies in multi-omics. In: Tarnoki AD, Tarnoki DL, Harris JR, Segal NL, editors. Twin research for everyone. Elsevier; 2022. p. 547–584. · DOI
  50. 10.3758/s13428-013-0386-2 · DOI
  51. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/biomet/75.2.383 · DOI
  53. 10.1186/s12864-025-11713-8 · DOI
  54. 10.3390/ijms25021168 · DOI
  55. 10.1089/bio.2025.0043 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bruellman, R., Evans, D., Smolen, A., Evans, L. M., & Reynolds, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Colorado
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Chandra A.
Venue
Epigenetics
Published
2026-04-15
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
2653960-2653960
ISSN
  • 1559-2294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2308
OpenAlex
W7154492183
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epigenetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (R01AG046938)
  • American Federation for Aging Research Hevolution/AFAR New Investigator Awards in Aging Biology
  • Geroscience Research (HEV~NI23013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
DNA methylation clocks, epigenetic aging, accelerated aging, tissue-specific methylation, saliva, buffy coat, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, monozygotic and dizygotic twins, zygosity, DunedinPACE, epigenetic age prediction, cognitive aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review