Cited by 2,540Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan

Open access
Lu, Ake T., Quach, Austin, Wilson, James G., Reiner, Alex P., Aviv, Abraham, Raj, Kenneth, Hou, Lifang, Baccarelli, Andrea A. +6 more·2019·Aging

Abstract

.Using large scale validation data from thousands of individuals, we demonstrate that DNAm GrimAge stands out among existing epigenetic clocks in terms of its predictive ability for time-to-death (Cox regression P=2.0E-75), time-to-coronary heart disease (Cox P=6.2E-24), time-to-cancer (P= 1.3E-12), its strong relationship with computed tomography data for fatty liver/excess visceral fat, and age-at-menopause (P=1.6E-12). AgeAccelGrim is strongly associated with a host of age-related conditions including comorbidity count (P=3.45E-17). Similarly, age-adjusted DNAm PAI-1 levels are associated with lifespan (P=5.4E-28), comorbidity count (P= 7.3E-56) and type 2 diabetes (P=2.0E-26). These DNAm-based biomarkers show the expected relationship with lifestyle factors including healthy diet and educational attainment.Overall, these epigenetic biomarkers are expected to find many applications including human anti-aging studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.101684

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with positive age gaps, termed age acceleration, are at greater risk of mortality and some diseases of ageing such as heart disease, metabolic syndrome and certain cancers.

    “These hypotheses have been supported by observations that individuals with positive age gaps, termed age acceleration, are at greater risk of mortality and some diseases of ageing such as heart disease, metabolic syndrome and certain cancers46–50.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • By design, second-generation clocks specifically designed to associate with mortality risk have robust associations with mortality risk, and some show associations with heart disease risk, physical functioning and several blood chemistry markers of health.

    “By design, all these clocks have robust associations with mortality risk, and some show associations with heart disease risk, physical functioning (balance, grip strength, walking speed) and several blood chemistry markers of health.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The DNAm GrimAge clock shows consistently stronger associations with various measures of age-related dysfunction, including heart disease, frailty, and cognitive and physical decline, compared to other clocks.

    “The DNAm GrimAge clock shows consistently stronger associations with various measures of age-related dysfunction, including heart disease, frailty, and cognitive and physical decline, compared to other clocks47,48,50,64–72.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The GrimAge clock trained methylation clocks directly on clinical protein markers and smoking pack-years, whose outputs were combined into a Cox proportional hazards model with age and sex to predict mortality.

    “The GrimAge clock48 took a similar approach but trained methylation clocks directly on clinical protein markers and smoking pack-years, whose outputs were then combined into a Cox proportional hazards model with age and sex to predict mortality.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Both PhenoAge and GrimAge models trained estimators of plasma proteins and metabolites with known disease biology.

    “Interestingly, both models trained estimators of plasma proteins and metabolites with known disease biology, again pointing to the plasma as fertile ground for future study.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, A. T., Quach, A., Wilson, J. G., Reiner, A. P., Aviv, A., Raj, K., Hou, L., Baccarelli, A. A., Li, Y., Stewart, J. D., Whitsel, E. A., Assimes, T. L., Ferrucci, L., & Horvath, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Assimes, Themistocles L.
  • Horvath, Steve
Venue
Aging
Published
2019-01-21
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
303-327
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912654909
Cited by
2,540
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 481 · 2025: 514 · 2024: 487 · 2023: 365 · 2022: 317 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 52
FWCI
57.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG029451, U01AG060908)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201300050C, HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201600018C, HHSN268201500001I, HHSN268201600004C, HHSN268201300048C, HHSN268201500001C, HHSN268201600001C, HHSN268201300049C, N01-HC-025195, R01HL116446, HHSN268201300047C, HHSN268201600003C, HHSN268201600002C)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM115428)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES020836)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
epigenetic clocks, DNA methylation, lifetime prediction, healthspan, time to death, coronary artery disease, cancer risk, hepatic steatosis, visceral fat, age at menopause, comorbidities, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, type 2 diabetes, anti-aging, lifestyle factors, educational attainment, diet
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Aging, Blood Proteins, Diet, Education, Female, Humans, Life Style, Longevity, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Databases, Factual, DNA Methylation, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review