The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion
Open accessAbstract
(2003). In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Ars Disputandi: Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 7-9.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why we read fiction: theory of mind and the novel
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1963 · Cited by 1,163
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion
Henrich, J. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005 · Cited by 693
The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity
Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002 · Cited by 624
Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature
Kelemen, D. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinde, R. A.
- Venue
- Ars Disputandi
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-9
- ISSN
- 1566-5399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2302188386
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 175.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15665399.2003.10819760
- The paper
- Hinde, R. A. (2003). In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Ars Disputandi. https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2003.10819760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
