Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monitoring of the UHPFRC strengthened Chillon viaduct under environmental and operational variability

Martín-Sanz, Henar, Tatsis, Konstantinos, Dertimanis, Vasilis K., Avendaño-Valencia, Luis David, Brühwiler, Eugen, Chatzi, Eleni·2020·Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
DOI 10.1080/15732479.2019.1650079
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Constructed in 1969, the Chillon viaducts constitute a vital component of the Swiss roadway network. The bridge deck was strengthened in 2015 by means of an Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement-based Composite for alleviating the effects of deterioration that has been induced by Alkali-Silica Reaction. In order to assess the efficacy of this rehabilitation solution, and to further evaluate its long-term performance, a Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) campaign was implemented, relying on low-cost, yet easily deployable, sensors. The deployed monitoring solution includes a suite of accelerometers, strain gauges, temperature and humidity sensors. This work studies and reports on the influence of operational (traffic) and environmental (temperature and humidity) conditions onto structural performance, on the basis of monitoring data extracted form the first moths of the monitoring campaign. To this end, the monitoring data are initially processed by means of standard modal analysis methods, as well as non-stationary time-series analysis tools. In a second step, a finite element model of the system is built and updated, and subsequently exploited to deliver a comparison between the original and rehabilitated structure. Finally, by exploiting the updated system model, a reliability analysis is carried out, which confirms the efficiency of the strengthening solution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15732479.2019.1650079

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Beton-Fib D., 2009, Bulletin, 1, 253
  2. Bez, R. (1989).Modélisation des charges dues au trafic routier.Thése No. 793. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
  3. Bez R., 1987, Periodica AIPC, 11, 153
  4. Ceppi P., 2008, Extreme value analysis of wind speed observations over Switzerland
  5. Csi S. V., 2010, Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual
  6. EN 1992-1-1, 2004, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings
  7. Jankowiak T., 2005, Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6, 53
  8. Limongelli M. P., 2016, EWSHM-8th European workshop on structural health monitoring
  9. Martín-Sanz H., 2017, Maintenance, Safety, Risk Management and Life-cycle Performance of Bridges (pp. 968 - 976).
  10. Perret, J., Muhlberg, H. P. S. & Cuennet, S. (2014).Reinforcement des viaducs de Chillon. Tracés, Bulletin technique de la Suisse romande(Tech. Rep.). Bulletin technique de la Suisse romande.
  11. Reynders E., 2011, Macec 3.2: A matlab toolbox for experimental and operational modal analysis
  12. SIA, 2016, . Ultra-hochleistungs-faserbeton (UHFB). Baustoffe, Bemessung und Ausfhrung
  13. SIA 261, 2014, Actions sur les structures porteuses
  14. SIA 262, 2013, Construction en bèton
  15. 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000872 · DOI
  16. Stubbs N., 1992, Proceedings of the ASCE 10th structures congress, 1, 543
  17. 10.1139/l99-049 · DOI

Cited by

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Martín-Sanz, H., Tatsis, K., Dertimanis, V. K., Avendaño-Valencia, L. D., Brühwiler, E., & Chatzi, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering (IBK), ETH Zürich, Switzerland;
  • SDU Embodied Systems for Robotics and Learning, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Institute, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark;
  • Structural Maintenance and Safety Laboratory (MCS), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Venue
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
138-168
ISSN
  • 1573-2479
  • 1744-8980
DOI
10.1080/15732479.2019.1650079
Cited by
22
References
87
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.