The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RELIABILITY OF GAIT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN MEN AND WOMEN WITH HEMIPARESIS AFTER STROKE
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of 6 gait performance tests in individuals with chronic mild to moderate post-stroke hemiparesis. DESIGN: An intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability study. SUBJECTS: Fifty men and women (mean age 58+/-6.4 years) 6-46 months post-stroke. METHODS: The Timed "Up & Go" test, the Comfortable and the Fast Gait Speed tests, the Stair Climbing ascend and descend tests and the 6-Minute Walk test were assessed 7 days apart. Reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), the Bland & Altman analysis, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%). RESULTS: Test-retest agreements were high (ICC(2,1) 0.94-0.99) with no discernible systematic differences between the tests. The standard error of measurement (SEM%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of individuals, was small (< 9%). The smallest real difference (SRD%), representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a single individual, was also small (13-23%). CONCLUSION: These commonly used gait performance tests are highly reliable and can be recommended to evaluate improvements in various aspects of gait performance in individuals with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x · Cited by 14,418
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800204 · Cited by 9,619
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1191/096228099673819272 · Cited by 9,619
The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments
Fleiss, J. L. (1999) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118032923 · Cited by 4,819
Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science
Hopkins, W. G. (2000) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 · Cited by 4,635
Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002 · Cited by 3,779
Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants
BOHANNON, R. W. (1997) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/26.1.15 · Cited by 2,341
Reference Equations for the Six-Minute Walk in Healthy Adults
ENRIGHT, P. L., & SHERRILL, D. L. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086 · Cited by 2,204
Cited by
Tilson, J. K., Sullivan, K. J., Cen, S. Y., Rose, D. K., Koradia, C. H., Azen, S. P., Duncan, P. W., & for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) Investigative Team (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090079 · Cited by 494
Mirelman, A., Maidan, I., Herman, T., Deutsch, J. E., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2011) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glq201 · Cited by 418
Huang, S.-L., Hsieh, C.-L., Wu, R.-M., Tai, C.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Lu, W.-S. (2011) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090126 · Cited by 401
Hiengkaew, V., Jitaree, K., & Chaiyawat, P. (2012) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.014 · Cited by 337
Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., & Deutsch, J. E. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.516328 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Lexell, J., Flansbjer, U.-B., Holmbäck, A. M., Downham, D., & Patten, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Publisher
- Medical Journals Sweden AB
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-82
- ISSN
- 1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168113782
- Cited by
- 1,242
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RELIABILITY OF GAIT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN MEN AND WOMEN WITH HEMIPARESIS AFTER STROKE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/16501970410017215
- The paper
- Lexell, J., Flansbjer, U.-B., Holmbäck, A. M., Downham, D., & Patten, C. (2005). RELIABILITY OF GAIT PERFORMANCE TESTS IN MEN AND WOMEN WITH HEMIPARESIS AFTER STROKE. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410017215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
