CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of an inference-based approach to treating obsessive–compulsive disorder

O'Connor, K. P., Aardema, F., Bouthillier, D., Fournier, S., Guay, S., Robillard, S., Pélissier, M. C., Landry, P., Todorov, C., Tremblay, M., Pitre, D.·2005·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
DOI 10.1080/16506070510041211
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated an inference-based approach (IBA) to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by comparing its efficacy with a treatment based on the cognitive appraisal model (CAM) and exposure and response prevention (ERP). IBA considers initial intrusions in OCD (e.g. "Maybe the door is open", "My hands could be dirty") as idiosyncratic inferences about possible states of affairs arrived at through inductive reasoning. In IBA such primary inferences represent the starting point of obsessional doubt, and the reasoning maintaining the doubt forms the focus for therapy. This is unlike CAM, which regards appraisals of intrusions as the maintaining factors in OCD. Fifty-four OCD participants, of whom 44 completed, were randomly allocated to CAM, ERP or IBA. After 20 weeks of treatment all groups showed a significant reduction in scores on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Padua Inventory. Participants with high levels of obsessional conviction showed greater benefit from IBA than CAM. Appraisals of intrusions changed in all treatment conditions. Strength of primary inference was not correlated with symptom measures except in the case of strong obsessional conviction. Strength of primary inference correlated significantly with the Y-BOCS insight item. Treatment matching for high and low conviction levels to IBA and CAM, respectively, may optimize therapy outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506070510041211

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Beck A. T., 1979, Cognitive Therapy of Depression.
  2. Bouman T. K., 2002, Cognitive behavioural group treatment for body dysmorphic disorder. Paper presented at the 32nd Congress of the European Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies.
  3. Brown T. A., 1994, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM‐IV.
  4. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn).
  5. Freeston M. H., 1997, Self‐monitoring for OCD studies: Instructional guide for the therapists. Unpublished paper, available from the Centre de recherche Fernand‐Seguin, 7331 Hochelaga St., Montréal, Québec, H1N 3V2.
  6. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.801 · DOI
  7. Janet P., 1903, Les obsessions et la psychasthénie (vols 1 & 3, 2nd edn).
  8. Jaspers K., 1963, General Psychopathology (translated by J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton).
  9. Keijsers G., 1995, Motivation and experience toward treatment questionnaire. Unpublished scale. University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  10. Pélissier M. C., 2002, The role of inductive reasoning in obsessional doubt. Paper presented at the 32nd EABCT Congress of the European Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies. Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  11. Rachman S., 1983, Failures in Behavior Therapy.
  12. Spitzer R. L., 1991, Manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐III‐R with psychotic screen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
O'Connor, K. P., Aardema, F., Bouthillier, D., Fournier, S., Guay, S., Robillard, S., Pélissier, M. C., Landry, P., Todorov, C., Tremblay, M., & Pitre, D.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
  • Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
  • Hôpital Notre-Dame (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-09-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
148-163
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
DOI
10.1080/16506070510041211
OpenAlex
W1980764277
Cited by
109
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, exposure and response prevention, intrusive thoughts, inductive reasoning, treatment matching, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Desensitization, Psychologic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review