Cited by 285Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A meta-analysis on the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A comparison of antidepressants, behavior, and cognitive therapy

van Balkom, A·1994·Clinical Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(94)90033-7

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Balkom, A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
359-381
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141250764
Cited by
285
References
114
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, antidepressants, behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, clomipramine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, serotonergic antidepressants, combination therapy, treatment efficacy, self-reported symptoms, long-term treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review