The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital degrowth: toward radically sustainable education technology
Open accessAbstract
This paper outlines how ideas of ‘degrowth’ might be used to reimagine sustainable forms of education technology. In essence, degrowth calls for a proactive renewal of technology use around goals of voluntary simplicity and slowing-down, community-based coproduction and sharing, alongside conscious minimalization of resource consumption. The paper considers how core degrowth principles of conviviality, commoning, autonomy and care have been used to develop various forms of ‘radically sustainable computing’. The paper then suggests four ways in which degrowth principles might frame future thinking around education technology in terms of: (i) curtailing current manipulative forms of education technology, (ii) bolstering existing convivial forms of education technology; (iii) stimulating the development of new convivial education technologies; and (iv) developing digital technologies to achieve the eventual de-schooling of society. It is concluded that mobilisation of these ideas might support a much-needed reorientation of digital technology in education along low-impact, equitable lines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The rapid pace of adoption of GenAI tools, when it comes to similar concerns, have significantly exacerbated the many socio-technical issues researchers have connected to education technologies in general [160, 311] and algorithmic harms related to GenAI [317] more specifically.”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [311]
In the citing paper
“Proposals that transcend profit-driven imperatives, such as limiting the scale of AI (so-called 'digital degrowth' [104]) or policy mechanisms such as a carbon tax on data center usage, remain on the fringes of the field.”
From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5169 · Cited by 1,875
(2020) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001 · Cited by 1,706
Illich, I. (1973) · doi:10.1558/isbn.9780714521602 · Cited by 1,410
Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era
Kerschner, C. (2015) · Cited by 797
(2020) · Cited by 725
What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G. M. D. S., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Gil, J. M. S. (2019) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945 · Cited by 350
Self-citationEmerging models of data governance in the age of datafication
Micheli, M., Ponti, M., Craglia, M., & Berti Suman, A. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720948087 · Cited by 332
Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future
Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020) · Geography and sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001 · Cited by 291
Degrowth: from theory to practice
Sekulova, F., Kallis, G., Rodríguez‐Labajos, B., & Schneider, F. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.022 · Cited by 251
Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries
Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147 · Cited by 195
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Barbas Babtista, G. 2020. “Free Software: Re-Decentralising the Internet and Developing Commons.” In Degrowth in Movement(s), edited by N. Treu, M. Schmelzer, and C. Burkhart. London: Zero Books. https://zoboko.com/text/8e0wqm6q/degrowth-in-movements-exploring-pathways-for-transformation/22.
- Brevini, B. 2021. Is AI Good for the Planet?. Cambridge: Polity.
- Helfrich, S., and D. Bollier. 2015. “Commons.” In Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a new era, edited by G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, and G. Kallis. Routledge.
- Illich, I. 1971. Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row.
- Illich, I. 1973. Tools of Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
- Kallis, G., F. Demaria, and G. D’Alisa. 2015. “Introduction.” In Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, edited by G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, and G. Kallis, 1–18. New York: Routledge.
- Kallis, G., S. Paulson, G. D’Alisa, and F. Demaria. 2020. The Case for Degrowth. Cambridge: Polity.
- Latouche, S. 2009. Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity.
- Schumpter, E. 1980. Good Work. New York: Harper Collins.
- Todd, J. 2012. “From Deschooling to Unschooling.” In Anarchist Pedagogies, edited by R. Haworth, 69–87. San Francisco, CA: PM Press.
- Tooze, A. 2021. Shutdown: How COVID Shook the World Economy. London: Allen Lane.
- UNESCO. 2015. Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Paris: World Education Forum (ED-2016/WS/2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing Postdigital Futures: Which Designs? Whose Futures?
Macgilchrist, F., Allert, H., Pargman, T. C., & Jarke, J. (2023) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-022-00389-y · Cited by 131
Post-growth Human–Computer Interaction
Sharma, V., Kumar, N., & Nardi, B. A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3624981 · Cited by 119
Defining the Meaning and Scope of Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions
Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. D. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14030048 · Cited by 86
Luccioni, A. S., Strubell, E., & Crawford, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732007 · Cited by 71
Ouyang, Z., Jiang, Y., & Liu, H. (2024) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7677 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Selwyn, N.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Selwyn, Neil
- ORCID
- Selwyn, Neil
- Venue
- Learning, Media and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-01-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-199
- ISSN
- 1743-9884 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9892
- OpenAlex
- W4313527780
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14
- FWCI
- 30.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Learning Media and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Monash University (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- degrowth, educational technology, green computing, conviviality, commoning, autonomy, care, simple living, resource consumption, deschooling, sharing, digital technology in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review