Cited by 18Migration, Identity, and HealthMigration, Racism, and Human RightsMigration, Health and Trauma

Is health a labour, citizenship or human right? Mexican seasonal agricultural workers in Leamington, Canada

Barnes, Nielan·2013·Global Public Health

Abstract

Post-North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) trade liberalisation combined with post-9/11 border securitisation means North America increasingly relies on pools of temporary foreign labour, particularly in the agricultural and service sectors. Despite being temporary, these workers often spend most of their years on foreign soil, living and working in isolated rural communities, far from their own families and communities. Migrants' mental and physical health suffers due to hazardous and stressful working conditions, sub-standard housing, lack of social support and limited access to health and social welfare services. Assuming access to health is a basic human right, who is responsible for the health of temporary foreign migrant workers? Is it the nation-state? or the Employers and/or unions? or Civil society? Research and practice show that a combined multisector approach is best; however, such initiatives are often uneven due to questions of sovereignty and citizenship rights. Community-based organisations (CBOs) have emerged to advocate for and serve migrants' social and welfare needs; analysis of CBO projects reveals an uneven application of rights to migrants. Using a comparative case study from Canada, this project contributes to understanding how civil-society helps to activate different types of health care rights for migrants, and to create an informed policy that provides migrant workers with access to a wider range of human and health rights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2013.791335

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, N.
Affiliations
California State University, Long Beach (US)
Corresponding author
Barnes, Nielan
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2013-07-10
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
654-669
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W1987974816
Cited by
18
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
migrant health, seasonal agricultural workers, Mexican migrant workers, right to health, citizenship rights, civil society, community organizations, health care access, migrant workers' rights
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Canada, Employment, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Humans, Human Rights, International Cooperation, Labor Unions, Mexico, Transients and Migrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review